and if i use flash SST - SST39VF3201(4MB), I was getting message like this
Internal flash device timeout occurred or write operation was performed
while flash was programming.
i think i was getting these warnings as SST flash is little faster than
Spansion. When i was using CFI probe, the ch
xavier.montagne ha scritto:
> Does the "system"function work well with uClinux 2.4 (vfork instead of
> fork) ?
>
> Cordialement,
> Xavier MONTAGNE
> Pragmatec
> 06.98.06.21.55
I use it on a coldfire NOMMU vfork system, no particular problem at the
moment,
but of course a problem is always "beside t
Jivin Matt Waddel lays it down ...
> Hi,
>
> If I run nano-X twice the 2nd time crashes the kernel. (I
> know running nano-X twice is the wrong thing to do, but even
> so I would expect there would be better response that a kernel
> panic.) Any ideas or is this the best option available?
>
> R
Hi,
If I run nano-X twice the 2nd time crashes the kernel. (I
know running nano-X twice is the wrong thing to do, but even
so I would expect there would be better response that a kernel
panic.) Any ideas or is this the best option available?
Regards,
Matt
The target platform is an M5329EVB an
Hi, I'm currently using the 20061117 ltib from Freescale that came with my
MCF5329EVB. I have made progress developing drivers, but need to get my
flash working. I know it's buggy and have been goggling this problem. I'm
new to the uclinux development so I don't know where the patch is located
that
The snapgear distro does not manage 44B0X target. How do you expect to rebuild
the code for your target ? Do you already have something to start ?
Cordialement,
Xavier MONTAGNE
Pragmatec
06.98.06.21.55
- Original Message -
From: Kevin（163）
To: uClinux development list
Sent: W
Hi,
I have test and use the "20070130 release", but some drivers and apps have
bugs, and the "20070823 test" dont have these bugs.
Many programs very useful are present on test distribution and not compatible
with other distributions.
For my problem the "mount -t nfs" is a standard on uc
