How to use uc53281(freescale)-EVM
thanks
--
在2009-01-05，"David McCullough" 写道：
>
>Jivin Yuan-Lung Li lays it down ...
>> Dear DavidM,
>> I have other questions about the romfs.2.4.x.gz on the website
>> http://www.uclinux.org/pub/uClinux/utilities/armulator/
>>
>> 1. What version of toolcha
Hi all,
I have performance problems with applications on this kernel(uClinux
2.6.25-uc0).
First of all, I have custom made board with this features:
ColdFire 5274 @ 150 MHz
External Bus Frequency 75 MHz
uClinux 2.6.25 boot up and work perfectly stable, but very slow. For
this board i have als
I have just managed to update a system from an older 2.4 kernel to
the most recent 2.4.34.5-uc0 version. It looks like there were some
checks added to the AMD FLASH drivers that totally break SST FLASH
devices.
1) Where is the best place to complain? Was the old functionality
hidden s
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
---
user/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/user/Kconfig b/user/Kconfig
index fc1135b..632ec1e 100644
--- a/user/Kconfig
+++ b/user/Kconfig
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@ config USER_MTDUTILS_MKFSJFFS
depends on USER_MTDUTI
Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
Applied,
Thanks,
Davidm
> ---
> user/Kconfig |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/user/Kconfig b/user/Kconfig
> index fc1135b..632ec1e 100644
> --- a/user/Kconfig
> +++ b/user/Kcon
Hi Glenn,
do you use CFI to detect your SST-Flash? I stumbled on this problem
half a year ago on 2.6.x, I found out that SST has quite an
interesting interpretation of the CFI-Standard. Their devices have
both sectors and eraseblocks, and their CFI-Struct lists both, so the
sum of all sec
