Re[2]: [uClinux-dev] memory fragmentation

2009-02-11 Thread Andrei Martynov
Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 1:27:53 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > The problem you have isn't really that it uses all memory for disk > cache - that's a good thing I believe that any continuos memory (re)allocation is evil on nommu platform with limited resources and should be avoided. How do others

Re: [uClinux-dev] memory fragmentation

2009-02-11 Thread Jamie Lokier
Andrei Martynov wrote: > Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 1:27:53 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > > The problem you have isn't really that it uses all memory for disk > > cache - that's a good thing > > I believe that any continuos memory (re)allocation is evil on nommu > platform with limited resources a

Re: [uClinux-dev] memory fragmentation

2009-02-11 Thread Farrell Aultman
We have been fighting this problem for 4 years using uClinux 2.4. Upgrading to uClinux 2.6 is not an option for me right now. It really helps if you write all of your apps in C and statically allocate all of your memory. You can make programs that reload often "execute in place". Another trick

RE: [uClinux-dev] howto generate Kconfig files from Config.in for busybox

2009-02-11 Thread Lars Holowko
Thanks a lot Mike, config.in-to-kconfig.sh did the trick. By the way, I really like to support multiple versions of an app in your user tree. I hope the uclinux-dist people will pick it up for their next release. Lars -Original Message- From: Mike Frysinger [mailto:vap...@gentoo.org] S

Re: [uClinux-dev] howto generate Kconfig files from Config.in for busybox

2009-02-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 11 February 2009 19:26:48 Lars Holowko wrote: > Thanks a lot Mike, > > config.in-to-kconfig.sh did the trick. great, glad it worked for you > By the way, I really like to support multiple versions of an app in your > user tree. I hope the uclinux-dist people will pick it up for their

Re: [uClinux-dev] howto generate Kconfig files from Config.in for busybox

2009-02-11 Thread Thomas Chou
Mike Frysinger wrote: ive tried convincing the uClinux-dist guys to use some of the methodologies that we've adopted in the Blackfin uClinux dist, but it doesnt look like it's going to happen, so ive given up :/ Hi Mike, We adopted the excellent works from Blackfin uClinux dist to Nios2 uCl