Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: Questions about compile user/xxxx

2009-04-22 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Sofian, sofian sindhi wrote: Dear all: I find the place where it is. It is located at include $(ROOTDIR)/vendors/config/armnommu/config.arch and I replace -msoft-float with -mhard-float in CFLAGS, but I still get the error message like ERROR:

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread Jamie Lokier
Lennart Sorensen wrote: Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux? I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux that I didn't bother to try. I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF, and of course uClinux tends to include MMUs now. --

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Jamie Lokier lays it down ... Lennart Sorensen wrote: Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux? I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux that I didn't bother to try. I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF, and of

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread Jamie Lokier
David McCullough wrote: I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux that I didn't bother to try. I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF, and of course uClinux tends to include MMUs now. Actually, it has little to do with the

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread David McCullough
Jivin Jamie Lokier lays it down ... David McCullough wrote: I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux that I didn't bother to try. I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with FDPIC-ELF, and of course uClinux tends to include MMUs now.

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: I was more thinking of all those loadable modules. Without FDPIC-ELF there's no dlopen() and no (useful) shared libs. Hmm, FDPIC ELF sounds a lot more useful than FLAT. I wonder if it would be possible to add FDPIC support to m68k

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:13PM +1000, David McCullough wrote: There's a good reason that only sash and the minix shell work on !MMU, and the initially the minix shell needed a fair bit of work to make safe on !MMU :-) Seems to work very well now though. -- Len Sorensen

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread Jamie Lokier
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:13PM +1000, David McCullough wrote: There's a good reason that only sash and the minix shell work on !MMU, and the initially the minix shell needed a fair bit of work to make safe on !MMU :-) Seems to work very well now though.

Re: [uClinux-dev] torrent client

2009-04-22 Thread Jamie Lokier
Lennart Sorensen wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 01:14:00PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote: I was more thinking of all those loadable modules. Without FDPIC-ELF there's no dlopen() and no (useful) shared libs. Hmm, FDPIC ELF sounds a lot more useful than FLAT. I wonder if it would be possible