On Wednesday 22 April 2009 04:29:41 Jamie Lokier wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
I read enough of a rumour that Python doesn't run on MMU-less uClinux
that I didn't bother to try.
I guess it might work on MMU-less architectures with
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 16:19:56 Jamie Lokier wrote:
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:05:13PM +1000, David McCullough wrote:
There's a good reason that only sash and the minix shell work on !MMU,
and the initially the minix shell needed a fair bit of work to make
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:47:16AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
msh blows. few doesnt even cover it.
Well it was better than sash, which didn't do pipes or backticks or most
other things. Not many choices on nommu after all.
however, lets forget about the past. Denys has done a lot of work
Bittornado is python. Does python run on uclinux?
Some time ago I did a very primitive test with Python on uCLinux for
NIOS. Python did compile and I could type 1+1 and got 2.
-Michael
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
There is the original python version of the first torrent client. It might
be usable. The code was pulled a while back but should be out there some
where. If you can't find it, I have it some where and should be able to lay
my hands on it.
Bobby
- Original Message -
From: Peter
On Monday 27 April 2009 10:52:51 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 02:47:16AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
msh blows. few doesnt even cover it.
Well it was better than sash, which didn't do pipes or backticks or most
other things. Not many choices on nommu after all.
being
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 18:28:23 Peter Voslak wrote:
No I would rather think about a client that does not require a
webserver. I do not have a webserver and I don't want to do one in
order to get torrentflux running (or any other client).
i havent tried it, but i imagine ctorrent (enhanced)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
being better than something else does make it good ;)
Good enough then? Better than nothing? :)
if i were to do something crazy like go to http://busybox.net/, one might
think the answer obvious ...
Well that seems to indicate
On Monday 27 April 2009 13:14:11 Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
if i were to do something crazy like go to http://busybox.net/, one might
think the answer obvious ...
Well that seems to indicate 1.14.0 is released, but that it is
