Hi Kris,
Microbit_P43000 wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this list and (uC)linux overall.
However, with some persistence (and great interest in uClinux :-) I got the
uCLinux-dist
(20080808) ported and running smoothly on the Olimex SAM9-L9260 board
(similar to Atmel AT91SAM9260-EK).
I don't know y
>
> and 1<<16 == 0x0001, so correct would be
>
> addl #0x0001,%curptr@(TASK_INFO+TINFO_PREEMPT)
>
> And this can be optimized to add 1 to the high word:
>
> addqw #1,%curptr@(TASK_INFO+TINFO_PREEMPT+2)
I checked the "Coldfire family programmer's Reference" and find that it
indeed does n
On Thursday 02 July 2009 20:46:59 John Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > Due to shell portability issues (which is to say shell scripts are not
> > portable -- think Windows), convert elf2flt to C code.
>
> Honestly my gut reaction to this is "yuck". Not
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 22:17, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> John Williams wrote:
>> Honestly my gut reaction to this is "yuck". Not your implementation,
>> just the idea in general. C is great for lots of things, but
>> string-heavy control flow driving external utilities surely isn't one
>>
John Williams wrote:
>Honestly my gut reaction to this is "yuck". Not your implementation,
>just the idea in general. C is great for lots of things, but
>string-heavy control flow driving external utilities surely isn't one
>of them.
I've always wondered why elf2flt exists at all
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Due to shell portability issues (which is to say shell scripts are not
> portable -- think Windows), convert elf2flt to C code.
Honestly my gut reaction to this is "yuck". Not your implementation, just
the idea in general. C is great for
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 02:26:42PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> There is a common macro now for testing mixed pointer/errno values, so use
> that rather than handling the casts ourself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
Acked-by: Paul Mundt
___
uCli
Hello
I have a question about password protection of uClinux boot loader
I have dBug rom monitor loader for motorolla colfire
How can i protect my dBug from changes (IP and MAC address, for example)
With big thanx, BTrue
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uC
>
> No. Byte would be addqb.
I think you're right, I am not familiar coldfire assembly and
instruction. I just touched it no long time.
addqb instruction is not supported on coldfire platform.
Which better way to replace it? I tried to use addql, but it proves that
it's incorrect.
I guess my pa
>
> No, it isn't. It is equivalent to
> *(long *)((char *)¤t_thread_info()->preempt_count + 1) += 1
> which is of course completely bogus.
Sorry, I think I paste the redundant character for the codes (no '*'
char at front or end of addql and subql instruction)
I paste it again:
ENTRY(inthandler)
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> There is a common macro now for testing mixed pointer/errno values, so use
> that rather than handling the casts ourself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger
Acked-by: David Howells
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@ucli
11 matches
Mail list logo
