Hi all,
Joe,
about the debug line inside dm9000_interrupt,
//dm9000_dbg(db, 3, entering %s\n, __func__);
nothing change, first browsing attempt crashed the board with the same
call stack trace:
[4.66] eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
[ 54.34] BUG: spinlock
Hi all,
Joe,
about the debug line inside dm9000_interrupt,
//dm9000_dbg(db, 3, entering %s\n, __func__);
nothing change, first browsing attempt crashed the board with the same
call stack trace:
[4.66] eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
[ 54.34] BUG: spinlock
Hi Anelo,
On 30/12/10 19:59, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
[snip]
i phisically connected the HW interrupt pin of dm9000 to MCF5307 IRQ7
pin (pin68). dm9000 is configured (through a resistor to3.3V on pin 57)
not as default, but to act with HIGH to LOW interrupt edge, as MCF5307
understand, and the
Hi Greg and All,
infinite thanks, i solved finally my issue and the board is fully working.
I used IRQ7 line, casually, and unfortunately it was wrong.
IRQ7 is a special autovectored interrupt, in particular, it is an EDGE
interrupt, and not a LEVEL interrupt like IRQ1 to 6.
I used IRQ1 now,
