D]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 14:37 +0800, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> > On 6/18/07, David T. L. Wong < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > > don't know anything about it. I told them they have to allow end user
> > > run their code on the product if Linux adopt GPLv
On 6/18/07, David T. L. Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Relax, thats not going to happen. Linus dont want gpl v3 for the kernel.
>
> I dont want to buy boxes like the Tivo though.
>
So far it is. But how about Samba & NTFS-3g? Any component we used in
our product changes to GPLv3 would give
On 6/18/07, David T. L. Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
don't know anything about it. I told them they have to allow end user
run their code on the product if Linux adopt GPLv3. They response that I
shouldn't grand user the right of running their own code. They even
claim that if Linux adopt GPLv3
On 3/27/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 26 March 2007, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
> im just wondering if anybody else besides me is thinking of a gettext
> rewrite.
>
> or is catgets a better thing to do?
maybe, but how is that relevant to busybox ? gettex
im just wondering if anybody else besides me is thinking of a gettext rewrite.
or is catgets a better thing to do?
--
the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
h
what can make "__STDIO_AUTO_THREADLOCK(stream)" segfault in in et_dyn
on pax system?
a lost stream pointer? i noticed that the stream parameter has a value
of "2" is that right?
im really baffled why __GI_frwrite is called with a stream value of 2
which is passed to __STDIO_AUTO_THREADLOCK which
gnu sed actually works better with the libc regcomp
im impressed!
--
the thing i like with my linux pc is that i can sum up my complaints in 5 items
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinu
