>
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] BSP for Savant CPU card
To: uClinux development list
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hi Wilson,
Wilson Callan wrote:
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on patch
20070718. Ch
number for EPORT4
*/
savantInclude.patch
Description: Binary data
Wilson
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:19:36 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] BS
Hi Wilson,
Wilson Callan wrote:
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on patch
20070718. Changes from my previous submit:
1) removed change in setup.c
2) made a separate function for changes needed in config_BSP()
I suspect the bootparm code will not be acceptable to mainlin
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on patch
20070718. Changes from my previous submit:
1) removed change in setup.c
2) made a separate function for changes needed in config_BSP()
thanks, wilson
savantBSP20070718-2.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
__
Hi Wilson,
Wilson Callan wrote:
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on patch
20070718. Changes from my previous submit:
1) added change to setup.c. CONFIG_BOOTPARAM has been moved here in the
latest patch, but it was put below config_BSP(). i suggest it makes
more sense abo
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on patch
20070718. Changes from my previous submit:
1) added change to setup.c. CONFIG_BOOTPARAM has been moved here in
the latest patch, but it was put below config_BSP(). i suggest it
makes more sense above config_BSP() because this al
Hi Wilson,
Something else I just thought of too :-)
Wilson Callan wrote:
1. The linker script changes don't conform to the modern way of setting
the base and size of kernel RAM
2. Why the special case for vectors 240->255?
(I am unlikely to merge any special cases in that code)
1. I'
Hi Wilson,
Wilson Callan wrote:
Hi Greg,
1. The linker script changes don't conform to the modern way of setting
the base and size of kernel RAM
2. Why the special case for vectors 240->255?
(I am unlikely to merge any special cases in that code)
1. I'm not sure what you mean by this
Hi Greg,
1. The linker script changes don't conform to the modern way of
setting
the base and size of kernel RAM
2. Why the special case for vectors 240->255?
(I am unlikely to merge any special cases in that code)
1. I'm not sure what you mean by this. config.linux-2.6.x looks the
Hi Wilson,
Wilson Callan wrote:
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on distro
20070130. these are the bare bones files to use uClinux as we do on our
board. I will submit separate, complete, patch files for various
changes, fixes and additions to Serial, SPI, I2C, eTPU, etc
Hi, attached is a patch file to support our CPU card on distro
20070130. these are the bare bones files to use uClinux as we do on
our board. I will submit separate, complete, patch files for various
changes, fixes and additions to Serial, SPI, I2C, eTPU, etc.
thanks, wilson
savantB
11 matches
Mail list logo