Jie Zhang wrote:
On 11/25/2009 02:16 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
From: Jie Zhangjie.zh...@analog.com
The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
rather than copy_*_user() as the former includes an icache flush. This is
important when doing
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 06:49, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Jie Zhang wrote:
On 11/25/2009 02:16 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
From: Jie Zhangjie.zh...@analog.com
The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
rather than copy_*_user() as the former
From: Jie Zhang jie.zh...@analog.com
The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
rather than copy_*_user() as the former includes an icache flush. This is
important when doing things like setting software breakpoints with gdb.
So switch the nommu code over to do the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
From: Jie Zhang jie.zh...@analog.com
The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
rather than copy_*_user() as the former includes an icache flush. This is
important when doing things like setting software breakpoints with gdb.
So switch
Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
From: Jie Zhang jie.zh...@analog.com
The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
rather than copy_*_user() as the former includes an icache flush. This is
important when doing things like setting software breakpoints with
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 02:27:22PM +0800, Jie Zhang wrote:
On 11/25/2009 02:16 PM, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
From: Jie Zhangjie.zh...@analog.com
The mmu code uses the copy_*_user_page() variants in access_process_vm()
rather than copy_*_user() as the former includes an
