Hi Philippe,
Philippe De Muyter wrote:
m68knommu : Fix strace support for 68328/68360
strace enabled is marked using the `flags' field of the `thread_info' struct.
68360 version of entry.S did test a wrong bit in a wrong structure
(task_struct).
68328 version of entry.S did test the right bit
m68knommu : Fix strace support for 68328/68360
strace enabled is marked using the `flags' field of the `thread_info' struct.
68360 version of entry.S did test a wrong bit in a wrong structure
(task_struct).
68328 version of entry.S did test the right bit in the right structure,
but wrongly, becaus
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 17:39, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:14:32AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>> unless i'm missing something, you're only changing whitespace here.
>
> That's true,
>
>> and these account for more than half the patch. please keep
>> whitespace chan
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:14:32AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> unless i'm missing something, you're only changing whitespace here.
That's true,
> and these account for more than half the patch. please keep
> whitespace changes separate from real changes.
but that makes comparing the resul
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
> do_trace:
> - movel #-ENOSYS,%sp@(PT_OFF_D0) /* needed for strace*/
> + movel #-ENOSYS,%sp@(PT_OFF_D0) /* needed for strace*/
> subql #4,%sp
>
> -1: movel %d0,%sp@(PT_OFF_D0) /* save the
strace is enabled using the `flags' field of the `thread_info' struct.
68360 version of entry.S did test a wrong bit in a wrong structure
(task_struct).
68328 version of entry.S did test the right bit in the right structure,
but wrongly, because the `flags' field is 32 bit wide, while the used
asse
