On Friday 14 September 2007 00:36, Matt Waddel wrote:
Hi Matt,
> If I run nano-X twice the 2nd time crashes the kernel. (I
> know running nano-X twice is the wrong thing to do, but even
> so I would expect there would be better response that a kernel
> panic.) Any ideas or is this the best opti
Jivin Matt Waddel lays it down ...
> Hi,
>
> If I run nano-X twice the 2nd time crashes the kernel. (I
> know running nano-X twice is the wrong thing to do, but even
> so I would expect there would be better response that a kernel
> panic.) Any ideas or is this the best option available?
>
> R
Hi,
If I run nano-X twice the 2nd time crashes the kernel. (I
know running nano-X twice is the wrong thing to do, but even
so I would expect there would be better response that a kernel
panic.) Any ideas or is this the best option available?
Regards,
Matt
The target platform is an M5329EVB an
