Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread xavier.montagne
ursday, March 01, 2007 1:36 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Hi Xavier, xavier.montagne wrote: Finaly I succeeded to fix the bug : the S3C44 uses physicaly shared IT and we need to clear the EXTINTPND before the general INTPND flag. The problem with this Samsung CPU is that you can not

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread Greg Ungerer
river. I've got : READ_CAPACITY error. Xavier - Original Message - From: "Daniel Alomar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "uClinux development list" Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Hi, I dummy question... How far is c

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread Greg Ungerer
t;uClinux development list" Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:29 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Hi, Which Coldfire did you use? I'm using the SL811HS with the 5282 and I have to use with an external driver. The driver was provide by a collegue from the list (Julien) an

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread xavier.montagne
"Daniel Alomar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "uClinux development list" Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:20 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Hi, I dummy question... How far is compatible snapgear from uClinux-dist? Regards, Daniel Alomar En/na xavier.mont

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread xavier.montagne
velopment list" Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Perhaps they share interrupts? Is SA_SHIRQ flag set on both eth irq and usb irq? -Original Message- From: "xavier.montagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "uClinux

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread Daniel Alomar
- From: "Daniel Alomar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "uClinux development list" Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 7:29 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Hi, Which Coldfire did you use? I'm using the SL811HS with the 5282 and I have to use with an

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread Per Hallsmark
Perhaps they share interrupts? Is SA_SHIRQ flag set on both eth irq and usb irq? -Original Message- From: "xavier.montagne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "uClinux development list" Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 01:39:02 +0100 Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host &g

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-28 Thread xavier.montagne
y 28, 2007 7:29 AM Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host Hi, Which Coldfire did you use? I'm using the SL811HS with the 5282 and I have to use with an external driver. The driver was provide by a collegue from the list (Julien) and I made some modifications. It works but I have problem

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-27 Thread Daniel Alomar
Hi, Which Coldfire did you use? I'm using the SL811HS with the 5282 and I have to use with an external driver. The driver was provide by a collegue from the list (Julien) and I made some modifications. It works but I have problems when I write some data to the usb disk. I would like to use t

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-27 Thread xavier.montagne
the key !!! I don't understand the relationship between the Ethernet controler and the sl811 !?? Xavier - Original Message - From: "Steve Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "uClinux development list" Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 12:06 AM Subject: R

Re: [uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-27 Thread Steve Bennett
Hi Xavier, I'm not sure if this will help you, but I had something of a similar problem which was caused by certain USB keys returning both a NAK and an ERROR indication at the same time. A case which was handled incorrectly in the driver. You might like to try this patch and see if it help

[uClinux-dev] SL811 usb host

2007-02-27 Thread xavier.montagne
Hi, I've got a problem with my sl811 controler : with some USB keys everything is frozen after a "ls /mnt/*". I need to put an additionnal delay in the sl811_interrupt (mdelay(5)) to be able to access this key properly. But now the access is really slow... Did anyone had the same behavior ? I