Re: [udig-devel] udig 1.2.M0

2008-12-23 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Jody, great job, thanks. Andrea On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: > Eric Jarvies wrote: >> >> yes, that link works for me. now i just need to find a windows machine :) > > Harry may yet manage to help us on that front. I am uploading the sdk now > ... we are actually lur

Re: [udig-devel] udig 1.2.M0

2008-12-22 Thread Jody Garnett
Eric Jarvies wrote: yes, that link works for me. now i just need to find a windows machine :) Harry may yet manage to help us on that front. I am uploading the sdk now ... we are actually lurking in the udig channel if you want to chat. Jody ___ User

Re: [udig-devel] udig 1.2.M0

2008-12-22 Thread Eric Jarvies
yes, that link works for me. now i just need to find a windows machine :) On Dec 22, 2008, at 8:39 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: I can see the file there: - http://udig.refractions.net/files/downloads/udig-1.2-M1-win32.win32.x86.zip Is that working for you? I am not sure if it will get recognize

Re: [udig-devel] udig 1.2.M0

2008-12-22 Thread Jody Garnett
I can see the file there: - http://udig.refractions.net/files/downloads/udig-1.2-M1-win32.win32.x86.zip Is that working for you? I am not sure if it will get recognized by the automagic download page ... it is supposed to but I may of not named the file correctly. Jody Eric Jarvies wrote:

Re: [udig-devel] udig 1.2.M0

2008-12-22 Thread Eric Jarvies
Jody, Will you be posting this to the http://udig.refractions.net/files/downloads/ directory? Or elsewhere? Eric On Dec 22, 2008, at 8:20 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: I have uploaded a uDig 1.2.M0 ... it is a normal zip with a win32 jre installed. If someone can do better / or cross platform

[udig-devel] udig 1.2.M0

2008-12-22 Thread Jody Garnett
I have uploaded a uDig 1.2.M0 ... it is a normal zip with a win32 jre installed. If someone can do better / or cross platform it would be the next step. The SDK is being generated now. Jody Jody Garnett wrote: Hi Andrea: I have been able to build an SDK for John to use - I am not very confi

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-18 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Diggers, I finally made it to compile and run trunc. Funny that only yesterday I gave up, because it compiled but was missing swt, which is in the standard target platform. When I reopened it to try again, it had no more errors. Alright, I have to say that apart of Murphy, being sometimes a bit

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jody Garnett
andrea antonello wrote: So my question remains; are you able to run? I am on IRC (or any IM) if you need help... No, I wasn't able to run it. I'm not sure the real error is the ossim, but at least that one is throwing a readable one. Question for you; are you running the "udig.product" a

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Jody, >> No, no, hold on: >> udig1.2-M0/features/org.ossim-feature >> >> which results to be in: >> >> http://svn.geotools.org/udig/tags/1.2-M0/features/org.ossim-feature >> >> so there should be some, even if there is no plugin then. >> Andrea >> > > Okay yeah; I see that too - but it does not

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jody Garnett
andrea antonello wrote: No, no, hold on: udig1.2-M0/features/org.ossim-feature which results to be in: http://svn.geotools.org/udig/tags/1.2-M0/features/org.ossim-feature so there should be some, even if there is no plugin then. Andrea Okay yeah; I see that too - but it does not give me any

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jody Garnett
andrea antonello wrote: Alright, my hell on earth is here again :) I am just wondring why I am the only one not able to build udig trunc (please do not answer on this :)). However: The libs are not downloaded properly. net.refractions.udig.libs/lib/geoapi-2.2-M0.jar stais in the lib folder and

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Sweet; wanted to make sure I did not miss you on this one Now if you like this we can try packaging it up as a first SDK for the 1.2.x series, but I would rather have a shortlist of things for us all to fix before issuing an SDK Jody andrea antonello wrote: Hi Jody, Simone, I'm sure

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
No, no, hold on: udig1.2-M0/features/org.ossim-feature which results to be in: http://svn.geotools.org/udig/tags/1.2-M0/features/org.ossim-feature so there should be some, even if there is no plugin then. Andrea On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:18 PM, andrea antonello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
Oh my God, what happened then?!?!?! I'm pretty sure I checked out the right tag. But at least that is a starting point... I was going mad. Investigating... Andrea On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow now I am confused as well, I don't have ossim on trunk

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jody Garnett
Wow now I am confused as well, I don't have ossim on trunk or on the 1.2-M0 tag ... what is up? I wouldn't stress too much about the test plugins though Agreed. I can't launch, because of some strange ossim problem: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: The activator org.ossim.libs.LibsPlug

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
> I wouldn't stress too much about the test plugins though Agreed. I can't launch, because of some strange ossim problem: org.osgi.framework.BundleException: The activator org.ossim.libs.LibsPlugin for bundle org.ossim.libs is invalid I don't even have an ossim plugin in the workspace. I removed

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jesse Eichar
I wouldn't stress too much about the test plugins though On 9-May-08, at 4:42 PM, andrea antonello wrote: Alright, some problems left over are: Some plugins have the following problem, which is easy to solve, but I am wondering why that happens: Plug-ins declaring extensions or extension poin

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
Alright, some problems left over are: Some plugins have the following problem, which is easy to solve, but I am wondering why that happens: Plug-ins declaring extensions or extension points must set the singleton directive to trueMANIFEST.MF net.refractions.udig.catalog.tests.geotiff/META

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread Jesse Eichar
I had this problem too. It is not naming it M0 for some reason it is some timestamped jar. Quick fix is to remove the geoapi jar from the Runtime in the manifest and add the downloaded one. On 9-May-08, at 3:21 PM, andrea antonello wrote: Alright, my hell on earth is here again :) I am j

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
Alright, my hell on earth is here again :) I am just wondring why I am the only one not able to build udig trunc (please do not answer on this :)). However: The libs are not downloaded properly. net.refractions.udig.libs/lib/geoapi-2.2-M0.jar stais in the lib folder and is not added to the classp

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-09 Thread andrea antonello
Hi Jody, Simone, I'm sure interested to test the trunc! Just sorry for the delay, I've been on a fieldtrip (with the GPS-enebled udig, which rocks!!), so I wasn't available yesterday. I think I can take today to do some build and first testing, and then pass it to Silvia (see is mad in testing and

Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-08 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi again Andrea; I have confirmed that this tag works and is picking up versions of geoapi and geotools that are fixed and unchanging. Did you still have time to evaluate trunk? Jody Jody Garnett wrote: Hi Andrea, I think I have a udig trunk tagged and ready for your amusement... - GeoAPI tag

[udig-devel] uDig 1.2-M0

2008-05-07 Thread Jody Garnett
Hi Andrea, I think I have a udig trunk tagged and ready for your amusement... - GeoAPI tagged and deployed into maven as geoapi-2.2-M0 - GeoTools tagged and deployed into maven as gt-api-2.5-M2 etc... I think I may upload this to source forge as well? - uDig 1.2-M0 tagged; please check out and