Hi Andrea, Jody,
since Jody is working on this right now and has seen/built the
jgrasstools already, I will first try to get in sync with him and as
soon as we are successful, come back to you. That should be the most
productive way to go.
Ciao,
Andrea
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Andrea Aim
andrea antonello ha scritto:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
Just a general heads up - I have a couple of weeks to work on WPS client
functionality.
My goals are to focus on:
- ease of use (our existing view is okay but hardly friendly; while I
und
Yes I can; the uDig client is written again the GeoTools process API; if some
of the processes are "remote" and being run via WPS the user interface never
gets to find out.
So yes I will perform a lot of the testing against processes that are provided
as a plugin; but I expect a lot of my debug
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>
>> Just a general heads up - I have a couple of weeks to work on WPS client
>> functionality.
>>
>> My goals are to focus on:
>> - ease of use (our existing view is okay but hardly friendly; while I
>> understand we
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Just a general heads up - I have a couple of weeks to work on WPS client
> functionality.
>
> My goals are to focus on:
> - ease of use (our existing view is okay but hardly friendly; while I
> understand we cannot have a generic client and
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
Just a general heads up - I have a couple of weeks to work on WPS client
functionality.
My goals are to focus on:
- ease of use (our existing view is okay but hardly friendly; while I
understand we cannot have a generic client and expect it to be perfectly
friendly I
Just a general heads up - I have a couple of weeks to work on WPS client
functionality.
My goals are to focus on:
- ease of use (our existing view is okay but hardly friendly; while I
understand we cannot have a generic client and expect it to be perfectly
friendly I think we can do a bit bette
On Tuesday 15 June 2010 03:47:25 pm Jody Garnett wrote:
> Sounds good; do you want to put a new pdf up on the website? Or should we
> wait for next release.
>
> Jody
I have put the new pdf.
http://udig.refractions.net/files/tutorials/uDigWalkthrough1.pdf
cheers
--
Mauricio Pazos
www.axios.es
Sounds good; do you want to put a new pdf up on the website? Or should we wait
for next release.
Jody
On 15/06/2010, at 6:30 PM, Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> On Monday 14 June 2010 01:57:41 pm Jody Garnett wrote:
>> Please that would be great. For any group contributing to the walkthrough
>> are inv
On Monday 14 June 2010 01:57:41 pm Jody Garnett wrote:
> Please that would be great. For any group contributing to the walkthrough
> are invited to put their logo on the initial page - I figure that is fair?
>
> Jody
done. (Committed revision 31837)
cheers
--
Mauricio Pazos
www.axios.es
_
Please that would be great. For any group contributing to the walkthrough are
invited to put their logo on the initial page - I figure that is fair?
Jody
On 14/06/2010, at 9:15 PM, Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:03:05 am Mauricio Pazos wrote:
>> It is a good point. So we wi
On Thursday 10 June 2010 11:03:05 am Mauricio Pazos wrote:
> It is a good point. So we will work to solve the version compatibility
> issue (qualifier).
>
> cheers
We have solved the compatibility problem present in Axios plugins. By a rare
problems, the wizard was found an old version and produce
That is fine.
You are correct that I would need a stable well known server to test against.
Right now I am testing against some stood up for an OGC project. Perhaps the
legend view could be polished up as a suitable interesting community plugin; or
the axios tools :-)
Jody
On 10/06/2010, at
On Thursday 10 June 2010 10:20:33 am andrea antonello wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> I have a concern regarding WPS. It needs a server to test against.
> So I do not think that this should go into a walkthrough. It is a
> feature that needs too much effort (also to be explained such that an
> average user und
Hi Jody,
I have a concern regarding WPS. It needs a server to test against.
So I do not think that this should go into a walkthrough. It is a
feature that needs too much effort (also to be explained such that an
average user understands what that is) and will never be used by an
approaching user.
On Tuesday 08 June 2010 09:09:08 am Jody Garnett wrote:
> If it works out I would like to use WPS as the example "community" module
> in the walkthrough 1? Unless Axios has already listed themselves (which
> would be fine as well).
We did not added the Axios plugins as example in the walkthrough
I have had a look at the WPS client code; against a 52N server. And it is able
to connect and list the services; but thus far has been unable to send feature
collections back and forth.
I will be having a look tomorrow and see if I can get it to turn over.
If it works out I would like to use WPS
17 matches
Mail list logo
