Re: [UFRaw-Devel] crop area breakage

2009-11-23 Thread Greg Troxel
Frank van Maarseveen writes: > Moving the crop area around no longer works: the preview screen is > not updated (zoom-in/out updates it). I saw lossage in cropping also, with cvs from last night. pgp460dhqEPZF.pgp Description: PGP signature ---

[UFRaw-Devel] Fix Over/Under blinking

2009-11-23 Thread Bruce Guenter
Hi. The math in the switch_highlights function was changed recently as part of a code cleanup, but the resulting code broke highlight blinking by forcing the preview area to redraw to a zero width/height. The attached patch fixes it. -- Bruce Guenter http://untroubled.org/ diff

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Add trivial timer functions to assist in improving performance.

2009-11-23 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:29:18AM -0600, Udi Fuchs wrote: > Why not use glib's GTimer? Thanks for the hint ;-). Maybe it looks too trivial to apply but it makes it just a little bit easier to instantly add time measurement during development without having to recompile everything due to a header

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] lanczos versus linear interpolation for rotate

2009-11-23 Thread Omari Stephens
On 11/23/2009 10:38 AM, Martin Ling wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:33:05PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: >> >> I don't think the new method is an improvement for the image result but >> that may be debatable. The new method certainly is much slower. > > Regardless of whether one considers

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] lanczos versus linear interpolation for rotate

2009-11-23 Thread Martin Ling
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:33:05PM +0100, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > > I don't think the new method is an improvement for the image result but > that may be debatable. The new method certainly is much slower. Regardless of whether one considers the appearance of the result to be "better", ther

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] recent rotate changes

2009-11-23 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:26:15AM -0600, Udi Fuchs wrote: > I somehow missed this email. > > > The rotation has become a lot slower: the integral version of Lanczos > > resampling is 4.5 times slower than the linear interpolation code I > > wrote and the floating point version of Lanczos is even

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] lanczos versus linear interpolation for rotate

2009-11-23 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 08:24:03PM -0600, Udi Fuchs wrote: > I had to manually approve your message, since it past the 200KB > message size limit. I increased the limit to 500KB, still some > subscribers might have a problem with big attachments, so people > should be considerate when making large