Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-22 Thread Tomasz Golinski
> Actually this has been a "problem". The problem with recent UFRaw > versions not getting included by default in distributions, is that > people who buy the newest camera they can find, and then get > dissappointed UFRaw in their distro does not recognize their RAW > files. Even though it may alre

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-22 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On 11/22/09, Udi Fuchs wrote: > Rethinking my strategy, I'm considering aiming for a release early > March 2010. This should guaranty that 0.17 will make it to Ubuntu and > Fedora, as opposed to 0.16 that missed both distributions this time > around. I will still try to get lensfun ready for 0.17,

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-22 Thread Milan Knížek
Udi Fuchs píše v So 21. 11. 2009 v 16:32 -0600: > What do you think of this plan? I agree with the time based releases, too. Especially because of chance for better support of new cameras for ordinary users. regards, Milan Knizek knizek (dot) confy (at) volny (dot) cz http://www.milan-knizek.n

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-22 Thread Pascal de Bruijn
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Greg Troxel wrote: > I think Mark is right, and that waiting for just one more feature leads > to releases only happening every N years when people get too cranky. > > All that said, ufraw has not been a serious problem.  The last two > releases were 2008-12 and 20

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-22 Thread Greg Troxel
That seems reasonable, but to have a release we need a feature freeze. He emphasized the importance of time base releases, which are not bound by any specific feature. This seems to contradict my plans for ufraw-0.17, which are centered around getting lensfun ready. Aiming for a release ev

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-22 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:32:53PM -0600, Udi Fuchs wrote: [...] > Rethinking my strategy, I'm considering aiming for a release early > March 2010. This should guaranty that 0.17 will make it to Ubuntu and > Fedora, as opposed to 0.16 that missed both distributions this time > around. I will still

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-21 Thread Niels Kristian Bech Jensen
> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:32:53 -0600 > From: udifu...@gmail.com > To: ufraw-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release > > Rethinking my strategy, I'm considering aiming for a release early > March 2010. This should guaranty that 0.17 will make it to Ubuntu and > F

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-21 Thread Martin Ling
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 04:32:53PM -0600, Udi Fuchs wrote: > > What do you think of this plan? I think it's a good idea to try out. It would be good to ensure the latest releases get to the users, an it may encourage development more if there is a target date for the release. I often mean to do m

Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Time based release

2009-11-21 Thread Pascal de Bruijn
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:32 PM, Udi Fuchs wrote: > Hi, > > I heard a talk by Mark Shuttleworth today. The most interesting part > of talk was about his space travel. When talking about Ubuntu, he > didn't say anything that I haven't heard before. He emphasized the > importance of time base relea