'It is as if Chávez is Allende'            John Pilger                  
27 August 2007 11:59                    DisplayDCAd('220x240','1','');      
  I walked with Roberto Navarrete into the national stadium in Santiago, Chile. 
With the southern winter’s wind skating down from the Andes, it was empty and 
ghostly. Little had changed, he said: the chicken wire, the broken seats, the 
tunnel to the changing rooms from which the screams echoed. We stopped at a 
large number 28. “This is where I was, facing the scoreboard. This is where I 
was called to be tortured.”

Thousands of “the detained and the disappeared” were imprisoned in the stadium 
following the Washington­-backed coup by General Pinochet against the 
democracy of Salvador Allende on September 11 1973. For the majority people of 
Latin America, the abandonados, the infamy and historical lesson of the first 
“9/11” have never been forgotten. “In the Allende years, we had a hope the 
human spirit would triumph,” said Roberto. “But in Latin America those 
believing they are born to rule behave with such brutality to defend their 
rights, their property, their hold over society that they approach true 
fascism. People who are well dressed, whose houses are full of food, bang pots 
in the streets in protest as though they don’t have anything. This is what we 
had in Chile 36 years ago. This is what we see in Venezuela today. It is as if 
Chávez is Allende. It is so evocative for me.”

In making my film, The War on Democracy, I sought the help of Chileans such as 
Roberto and his family, and Sara de Witt, who courageously returned with me to 
the torture chambers at Villa Grimaldi, which she somehow survived. Together 
with other Latin Americans who knew the tyrannies, they bear witness to the 
pattern and meaning of the propaganda and lies now aimed at undermining another 
epic bid to renew both democracy and freedom on the continent. Ironically, in 
Chile, said to be Washington’s “model democracy”, freedom waits. The 
Constitution, the system of electoral control and the designer inequality are 
all Pinochet’s gifts from the grave. 

The disinformation that helped destroy Allende and give rise to Pinochet’s 
horrors worked the same way in Nicaragua, where the Sandinistas had the 
temerity to implement modest, popular reforms based largely on the English 
cooperative movement. In both countries the CIA funded the leading opposition 
media, although they need not have bothered. In Nicaragua, the fake martyrdom 
of the “opposition” newspaper, La Prensa, became a cause for North America’s 
leading liberal journalists, who seriously debated whether a poverty-stricken 
country of three million peasants posed a “threat” to the United States. Ronald 
Reagan agreed and declared a state of emergency to combat the monster at the 
gates. In Britain, whose Thatcher government “absolutely endorsed” US policy, 
the standard censorship by omission applied. In examining 500 articles that 
dealt with Nicaragua in the early 1980s, the historian Mark Curtis found an 
almost universal suppression of the achievements of the Sandinista
 government -- “remarkable by any standards” -- in favour of the falsehood of 
“the threat of a communist takeover”. 

The similarities in the campaign against the phenomenal rise of popular 
democratic movements today are striking. Aimed principally at Venezuela, 
especially Hugo Chávez, the virulence of the attacks suggests that something 
exciting is taking place; and it is. Thousands of poor Venezuelans are seeing a 
doctor for the first time in their lives, their children immunised and drinking 
clean water. On July 26 Chávez announced the construction of 15 new hospitals; 
more than 60 public hospitals are currently being modernised and re-equipped. 
New universities have opened their doors to the poor, breaking the privilege of 
competitive institutions effectively controlled by a “middle class” in a 
country where there is no middle. In Barrio La Linea, Beatrice Balazo told me 
her children were the first generation of the poor to attend a full day’s 
school and to be given a hot meal and to learn music, art and dance. “I have 
seen their confidence blossom like flowers,” she said. One night in
 barrio La Vega, in a bare room beneath a single light bulb, I watched Mavis 
Mendez, aged 94, learn to write her own name for the first time.

More than 25 000 communal councils have been set up in parallel to the old, 
corrupt local bureaucracies. Many are spectacles of raw grassroots democracy. 
Spokespeople are elected, yet all decisions, ideas and spending have to be 
approved by a community assembly. In towns long controlled by oligarchs and 
their servile media, this explosion of popular power has begun to change lives 
in the way Beatrice described. It is this new confidence of Venezuela’s 
“invisible people” that has so enflamed those who live in suburbs called 
Country Club. Behind their walls and dogs they remind me of white South 
Africans. Venezuela’s wild west media is mostly theirs; 80% of broadcasting and 
almost all the 118 newspaper companies are privately owned. Until recently one 
television shock jock liked to call Chávez, who is mixed race, a “monkey”. 
Front pages depict the president as Hitler, or as Stalin (the connection being 
that both like babies). Among broadcasters crying censorship loudest are
 those bankrolled by the National Endowment for Democracy, the CIA in spirit if 
not name. “We had a deadly weapon, the media,” said an admiral who was one of 
the coup plotters in 2002. The television station, RCTV, never prosecuted for 
its part in the attempt to overthrow the elected government, lost only its 
terrestrial licence and is still broadcasting on satellite and cable.

Yet, as in Nicaragua, the “treatment” of RCTV has been a cause celèbre for 
those in Britain and the US affronted by the sheer audacity and popularity of 
Chávez, whom they smear as “power crazed” and a “tyrant”. That he is the 
authentic product of a popular awakening is suppressed. Even the description of 
him as a “radical socialist”, usually in the pejorative, wilfully ignores that 
he is actually a nationalist and a social democrat, a label many in the British 
Labour Party were once proud to wear. In Washington, the old Iran-Contra death 
squad gang, back in power under Bush, fear the economic bridges Chávez is 
building in the region, such as the use of Venezuela’s oil revenue to end IMF 
slavery. That he maintains a neo- liberal economy with a growth rate of more 
than 10%, allowing the rich to grow richer, and described by the American 
Banker magazine as “the envy of the banking world” is seldom raised as valid 
criticism of his limited reforms. These days, of course, any
 true reforms are exotic. And as liberal elites under Blair and Bush fail to 
defend their own democracies and basic liberties, they watch the very concept 
of democracy as a top-down liberal preserve challenged on a continent about 
which Richard Nixon once said “people don’t give a shit”. However much they 
play the man, Chávez, their arrogance cannot accept that the seed of Rousseau’s 
idea of direct popular sovereignty may have been planted among the poorest, yet 
again, and “the hope of the human spirit”, of which Roberto spoke in the 
stadium, has returned. -- © John Pilger

Venezuela disowns provocative quake aid
Peru’s earthquake relief effort was shaken by a political row this week over 
food aid with labels bearing an image of Venezuela’s President Hugo Chávez and 
criticism of Peru’s government, writes Rory Carroll.

The cans of tuna, with labels lauding Chávez and condemning Peruvian 
authorities as “slow, inefficient and heartless”, were distributed to survivors 
of a quake that destroyed several towns and killed more than 500 people last 
week.

Peruvian President Alan Garcia expressed dismay. “One has to ask who is behind 
this. This is not the moment to take advantage of the circumstances to make 
electoral propaganda.” Garcia, who has been under fire for delays in getting 
food, blankets and other aid to stricken areas, has a tetchy relationship with 
the Venezuelan leader.

But Venezuela issued a forceful denial of any links to the polemical aid and 
said it might be an attempt to smear Chávez as a cynical opportunist. “This is 
a damaging manipulation, a vile manipulation because Venezuela has brought 
humanitarian aid, not party politics,” the country’s ambassador, Jose Armando 
Laguna, told CPN Radio in Lima. “If they want, they can go and open all the 
bags that [Venezuela] brought and verify there is no political propaganda.

Venezuela has sent two military aircraft with 25 tonnes of food over the Andes 
to Peru. Venezuela’s information minister, Willian Lara, said “hidden” forces 
were trying to make it appear that Chávez was manipulating the tragedy.

The cans were distributed in Chincha, the province south of Lima which bore the 
brunt of the 8,0 magnitude quake, but it has not been established by whom. The 
story broke in the Lima daily Expresso, a newspaper hostile to Chávez.

The label on the cans reads: “In the face of the natural disaster ... the 
Peruvian Nationalist party, along with our sister Bolivarian Republic of 
Venezuela, its leader Hugo Chávez and our leader Ollanta Humala, makes itself 
present because the Peruvian government acts in a slow, inefficient and 
heartless manner, not caring about the pain of the victims and leaving them 
suffering from hunger, thirst and theft.”

Humala is a leftwing opposition leader who was backed by Chávez in last year’s 
presidential election but lost to Garcia. He has been attempting to mount a new 
challenge on the back of the president’s sliding approval ratings. A 
spokesperson for Humala’s party denied any links to the controversial aid. -- © 
Guardian News & Media Ltd 2007

       
---------------------------------
 All new Yahoo! Mail - 
---------------------------------
Get a sneak peak at messages with a handy reading pane.
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to