My fellow compatriots, if "Federation is the answer for Uganda", what is
the question?

I find it odd that almost everybody is talking about the "answer" to a
question that is not patently clear to everyone. Can we have the right
question(s) asked before we evaluate the answer? Or do we want to have
the question put based on the answer(s) we have?

Incidentally, did I read something (recently) suggesting that Prof
Bukenya has become more circumspect on the Federo issue?

Best regards,

Yoswa.

_______________________________

Prof Yoswa M Dambisya
School of Health Sciences
University of the North
Private Bag X1106
SOVENGA 0727
SOUTH AFRICA
Phone: +27 15 268 2353
Fax:  +27 15 268 2523.
Alternate e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/03 01:11PM >>>
  Federation the answer for Uganda:With land about half of Buganda,
South Tyrol produces 30% of apples produced in Italy 

ONE of the subjects hotly discussed in Uganda for the last several
months has been Federal or to spoil the soup, Federo. 

When one critically assesses the arguments for a federal system, a
great number of people merely yearn for a "degree of devolution for
power" to relatively large areas (regions), big enough to manage their
affairs including economic self-sustenance. 

Not bad at all! During my nomadism on this great planet, I have
observed near perfect federated states in big and small countries (USA,
Germany, Australia, Papua New Guinea, and so on). 

I understand that even Westminister has joined the movement by
devolution of power to Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and I hear East
Anglia also wants it. These are all indicators that there might be
something good in federal. 

This week I was the guest of Dr Luis Dumwalder, the President of the
autonomous province of South Tyrol or commonly referred to locally as
"Sud! tirol". A magnificent province located in the valleys of
the Alps with a small but well managed capital Bozen or Bolzano in
Northern Italy. 

The Tyrolese are highly motivated, hardworking, devoted Italians but
also to their Tyrol. With a land mass about half of Buganda, they
produce 30% of all apples produced in Italy and 10% of all apples eaten
in the European Union. 

"Economic viability!" In the devolution, the Central Government of
Italy has retained the authority for Defence, Finance, Foreign Affairs,
Tax collection, partially Justice and Police. However, 90% of tax
collected in South Tyrol is given back to the province of Tyrol which is
responsible for Health, Education, Culture, Agriculture, Local road
networks, local police and judiciary. But this must all be done within
the limits of the Constitution of Italy. 

This concept of devolution seen here in South Tyrol and elsewhere
focuses on many issues but mostly the capacity for self-sustaining eco!
nomy not merely fragmented units waiting for hand-cuts from th! e centre
. 

Everyday that passes since this subject became hotly discussed in
Uganda, I get more and more inclined to believe that federation is the
answer for Uganda. 

Federation certainly reduces political pressure for competition to the
narrow space in the national leadership and allows for internal economic
competition between the federated units which in my view is healthy. 

I see no danger if these units manage their social services, local
road-networks, culture, agriculture, partial judiciary and police, with
70% of taxes collected within the unit being retained there for
implementing of their responsibilities. Certainly my journey to South
Tyrol was a good one because I was able to see the value of devolution.
Can I say like Winston Churchill, "my journey was worth two years at
University". 

And while I was away, my President hosted my Kabaka to a party at his
Rwakitura home. This is part of cultural devolution! The next could be
total devolution, ! who knows? 

Prof Gilbert B. Bukenya Minister in charge of the PresidencyNew Vision,
Published on: Wednesday, 1st May, 2002
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 

Reply via email to