Musinguzi's pull-out was cowardly move

By Ssemujju Ibrahim Nganda

I find the withdrawal of Reform Agenda’s James
Musinguzi Garuga from the Kinkizi West parliamentary
by-elections race cowardly, and a blow to Uganda’s
democratisation process.

Musinguzi's lawyer Ngaruye Ruhindi announced, a day to
the Jan. 14 nomination, that his client was pulling
out. This was shortly after the High Court in Mbarara
had dismissed Musinguzi’s application to postpone the
nomination until the Electoral Commission investigated
the presence of the army in the constituency.
The lawyer said thus, “Musinguzi has made it clear
that he will not participate in an election that will
put his constituents in more trouble and increase
trauma. He says during the previous election, one of
his supporters lost his manhood and another one an
eye”.
This statement alone shows how cowardly Musinguzi as a
politician is. How do you pull out of a political
contest on mere suspicion that your competitor is
likely to endanger your supporters? What sort of
politician is Musinguzi who abandons food and chooses
to starve simply because a wild child has threatened
him?
The statement that one of his supporters lost his
manhood and another his eye is more troubling.
Who told Musinguzi that contesting an election is an
introduction ceremony where a girl introduces her
fiancé to the parents? It is only on such occasions
that one may not expect injuries.
The Baganda say “Ensi eguula mirambo” which literally
means attaining freedom may involve sacrifice. 
Musinguzi should go for priesthood. He would make a
good pastor.
The House of Bishops of the Church of Uganda recently
postponed the consecration of Muhabura Diocese
bishop-elect; Rev. Can. David Sebuhinja to save lives.
They sensed the consecration would compound the chaos
in the diocese. This is religion. Politics calls for
boldness and bravery. 
If Musinguzi had lived during the colonial days he
would certainly have been labeled a collaborator. And
collaborators those days were traitors.
I didn’t know that Musinguzi was that submissive.
Suppose thugs attacked his family and threaten to
injure his wife and children. Would he abandon them or
put up a fight and die for his family.
Political struggles and the fight for freedom involve
sacrifice.
It may be in human life or property but you have to
lose in order to gain. Freedom is never got on a
silver platter. 
The Mau Mau in Kenya asserted during their uprising
against colonial maladministration that, “better war
than peace in chains.”
Why didn’t Musinguzi advise his friend Col. Kizza
Besigye to withdraw from the 2001 presidential race
when Kalangala Action Plan and other Movement forces
were pouncing on their supporters? People lost their
lives, others lost property but the struggle had to
continue. Remember an incident in Kireka along Jinja
Road where a soldier reversed his pick-up double-cabin
and drove into a crowd of supporters and five people
perished?
Does Musinguzi want us to believe that the lives of
the Kanungu people are more precious than those of
other Ugandans who died in the struggle for Besigye’s
political reforms? 
One thing I have noticed about our opposition
politicians; they always withdraw from a race as soon
as defeat stares them in the face. 
They also bash courts of law once they lose a case but
hail them once they emerge 
victorious. We all saw and heard what happened when
Winnie Babihuga of Reform Agenda lost a case against
her rival Winnie Masiko, a Movementist. 
It is such a thing that makes the opposition’s
struggle seem less genuine and make us believe that
all politicians are devils.
But most important, Musinguzi has forgotten that
President Yoweri Museveni’s political conspiracy has
been exposed by the numerous political contests we
have had. If the opposition had boycotted the 1996 and
2001 general election, we would never have known the
true colours of some politicians. For example,
Museveni would not deploy his Presidential Protection
Unit (PPU) in Rukungiri. Also the PPU men would not
have shot into a crowd of Besigye supporters and one
person died. It would also have been difficult for us
to know that Kalangala Action Plan headed by Maj.
Roland Kakooza Mutale could cause havoc.
Musinguzi should know that losing an eye or manhood
only serves to strengthen the struggle against bad
rule. If we continue engaging the powers, we would
have so many Ugandans with no eyes and no manhood. One
day with the presence of the media, these people would
know their aggregate disgruntlement and their
collective strengths. Once we get to this level, a
revolution would be inevitable.
What Musinguzi is doing is to block the revolution
from taking place.
By the way, Ugandans ought to study the politics of
boycott and internalise it thoroughly.
After the 1996 presidential election, Democratic Party
(DP) faithful gathered at their President General Dr.
Paul Kawanga Ssemogerere's Lubaga residence and wept.
Museveni had trounced them with about 74 percent of
the vote.
They under these circumstances made a regrettable
decision never to participate in any election
organised under the Movement political system. This
decision was communicated to journalists at a news
conference thereafter.
Five years down the road, the same people quietly
choose to reverse their decision. The result was that
they lost their constituencies.
Conservative Party (CP) candidate Ken Lukyamuzi
humiliated DP Secretary General Damiano Lubega and it
would require Allah’s intervention for him to ever
recover this Lubaga South seat.
Finally Musinguzi ought to understand that his
Movement colleagues are shameless and arrogant. Amama
Mbabazi would never be affected by Musinguzi’s pull
out. 
How do you expect people who used the army to capture
power in 1986, to be ashamed of using the same army to
maintain it? This would be expecting too much.
People ought to understand that Museveni does not
conduct elections because of his respect for
democracy. He is doing it to market his company, the
Movement, to attract foreign investors (donors) who
supplement our budget.
The only way to get out of the current political
stalemate is to engage the authority and expose their
dirty tricks. Disgruntled Ugandans would automatically
and naturally rise against them as Kenyans did or
otherwise.


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

Reply via email to