Thilo Goetz wrote:
I think the difficult UIMA developers find is not necessarily
an indication of the difficulty users would have. UIMA developers
are trying to keep multiple use cases of multiple kinds of users
(e.g. sofa-aware, sofa-unaware) in mind simultaneously, and come up
with a desig
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I think it's useful to recognize there are sofa-aware
components, and sofa-unaware components. Most of the components so
far are sofa-unaware ones - although this may change somewhat over
time. I think it is useful to make writing sofa-unaware components
"easy" in the s
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
As I see it, we're not going to reach consensus on this issue. I
guess this is at least in part due to the fact that we disagree on the
basic premises underlying this redesign. I am -1 to the current
proposal, and I'll give my reasons below. However,
