Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Eddie Epstein
On 5/14/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I prefer that we deprecate addToIndexes() and removeFromIndexes() but take reasonable steps to make the methods behave is closely to the current behavior as possible. If Marshall is willing to implement something a little more complex that reduce

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: Adam Lally wrote: On 5/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Before: --- MyAnnotation x = new MyAnnotation(someView_1); aView_1.addFsToIndexes(x); aView_2.addFsToIndexes(x); // removes from

adding an installer for UIMA distr

2007-05-14 Thread Marshall Schor
Some people have noticed (and complained) that Apache UIMA doesn't have an installer. The new thunderbird email system is using a free / open source installer, http://sourceforge.net/projects/nsis/ which might be appropriate. Is this a good thing to do, and do we have any volunteers (dev-list

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Adam Lally
On 5/14/07, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: JCas objects are broken if an FS instance can belong to multiple views, because 1) addToIndexes() is ambiguous and 2) hashed JCas instances are not shared across views. The suggestions above do not fix the situation for all scenarios, for examp

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Marshall Schor
Eddie Epstein wrote: On 5/14/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think there is a significant performance savings. So I'm willing to go with the following (let's see if I get this right...) Changes: 1) 1 map from CAS objects to JCas cover objects, shared by all views 2) The g

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Eddie Epstein
On 5/14/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think there is a significant performance savings. So I'm willing to go with the following (let's see if I get this right...) Changes: 1) 1 map from CAS objects to JCas cover objects, shared by all views 2) The getters from the iterat

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote: Adam Lally wrote: On 5/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Before: --- MyAnnotation x = new MyAnnotation(someView_1); aView_1.addFsToIndexes(x); aView_2.addFsToIndexes(x); // removes from view_1 aView_2.getAllIn

[jira] Closed: (UIMA-321) java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError is not handled correctly in CVD

2007-05-14 Thread Thilo Goetz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-321. Resolution: Duplicate Was fixed with uima-404 ;-) > java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError is not handled correctly

[jira] Closed: (UIMA-404) try to cast NoClassDefFoundError to Exception

2007-05-14 Thread Thilo Goetz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thilo Goetz closed UIMA-404. Resolution: Fixed > try to cast NoClassDefFoundError to Exception > -

[jira] Created: (UIMA-404) try to cast NoClassDefFoundError to Exception

2007-05-14 Thread Michael Baessler (JIRA)
try to cast NoClassDefFoundError to Exception - Key: UIMA-404 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-404 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: Tools Affects Versions: 2.1

[jira] Updated: (UIMA-403) XCASWriter and XmiWriter are not handling XML special characters

2007-05-14 Thread Bhavani Iyer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bhavani Iyer updated UIMA-403: -- Attachment: UIMA-403.patch normalize when exporting strings in string array and string list FSs. > XCASW

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Adam Lally
On 5/14/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Changes: 1) 1 map from CAS objects to JCas cover objects, shared by all views 2) The getters from the iterators would *update* the _Type ref to be the view associated with the iterator * this might be implemented by changing the generato

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Marshall Schor
Adam Lally wrote: On 5/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Before: --- MyAnnotation x = new MyAnnotation(someView_1); aView_1.addFsToIndexes(x); aView_2.addFsToIndexes(x); // removes from view_1 aView_2.getAllIndexedFS(MyAnnotation.ty

Re: changing the semantics (very slightly) for JCas objects with respect to Views

2007-05-14 Thread Adam Lally
On 5/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Before: --- MyAnnotation x = new MyAnnotation(someView_1); aView_1.addFsToIndexes(x); aView_2.addFsToIndexes(x); // removes from view_1 aView_2.getAllIndexedFS(MyAnnotation.type).get().removeFro

[jira] Commented: (UIMA-359) Blob serialization problems

2007-05-14 Thread Michael Baessler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12495563 ] Michael Baessler commented on UIMA-359: --- I verified your fixes... all seems to be fine now! Thanks, Michael > Bl