Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501723 ]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-402:
-
Marshall wrote (on uima-dev):
Basic thought: if the use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503630
]
Eddie Epstein commented on UIMA-387:
>So yes, documentation for string features is certainly a good idea, but we
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503601
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-387:
--
Well, those issues that I remember (and remembering things is not one of my
stron
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503591
]
Eddie Epstein commented on UIMA-387:
OK, I appreciate the concerns. Can we make sure that appropriate info is
docu
Any opinions on this issue? Should we try to get in for 2.2?
-Adam
On 6/5/07, Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501723
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-402:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 6/11/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For errors in the typeSystemInit() method of an annotator, annotator
writers can throw an AnnotatorConfigurationException or an
AnnotatorInitializationException.
Since the typeSystemInit() method is called during the annot
Adam Lally wrote:
On 6/8/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the old code is still in place that tries to set the result spec for the
next node, but I think it has no effect.
It is in CapabilityLanguageFlowObject.next()
// check if current engine should be called
if
On 6/11/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For errors in the typeSystemInit() method of an annotator, annotator
writers can throw an AnnotatorConfigurationException or an
AnnotatorInitializationException.
Since the typeSystemInit() method is called during the annotator
process() meth
For errors in the typeSystemInit() method of an annotator, annotator
writers can throw an AnnotatorConfigurationException or an
AnnotatorInitializationException.
Since the typeSystemInit() method is called during the annotator
process() method if the type system of the CAS has changed, the
proc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503435
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-360:
--
Some of the more basic CAS operations only do a few operations on ints. Just
che
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503434
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-360:
-
Change notification may also help if we want to implement "delta" responses
from a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-437.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
Also discovered and fixed a bug that was causing CASes released by a CAS
multiplier t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-442.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Should be fixed now.
> FileUtilsTest fail on Linux
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503429
]
Jörn Kottmann commented on UIMA-360:
I need a change notification layer for the cas editor. The different parts of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-437:
---
Assignee: Adam Lally (was: Marshall Schor)
> Annotators are not prevented from calling CAS.release()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503398
]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-387:
-
I think the fix in this issue is a step in the right direction. A next step
would
UIMA hasn't been tested with Axis 2.x. Whether it works depends on
how committed Axis is to maintaining backwards compatibility in their
APIs. If you find out whether it works, please let us know.
-Adam
On 5/29/07, Scott Songlin Piao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will the version 2.2 work with A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler closed UIMA-444.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Sandbox projects build only when in same directory as uimaj projects
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler updated UIMA-442:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.2
> FileUtilsTest fail on Linux
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler reassigned UIMA-442:
-
Assignee: Adam Lally
The code fragment below does not work on linux...
base = new File
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12503377
]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-360:
--
Joern, why do you need CAS change notification? It seems to me the CAS can
chang
Sandbox projects build only when in same directory as uimaj projects
Key: UIMA-444
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-444
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
22 matches
Mail list logo
