Marshall Schor wrote:
The documentation for this says:
"The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the actual
number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit java),
per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual JCas
cover instances longer than
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
The documentation for this says:
"The JCas cache ... incurs a steep memory overhead". I think the
actual number is ~1.5 * size-of-a-java-reference (4 bytes on a 32 bit
java), per JCas object, plus the overhead of holding on to the actual
JCas cover i
