Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox

2009-03-10 Thread Eddie Epstein
+1 I finally had a chance to talk to Marshall about this work. Sounds very good. Thanks for the contribution! Eddie On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thilo Goetz twgo...@gmx.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 Thilo Goetz wrote: Please vote to accept the

Re: small memory footprint tradeoff configuration

2009-03-10 Thread Marshall Schor
After reviewing the previous chain of discussion on this topic, I would like to start the next round, hopefully getting to some convergence :-). 1) On the topic of doing GC (garbage collection) versus copy to another CAS - GC is conceptually perhaps less complex - you don't have mutliple CASes

Re: [VOTE] Accept contribution of Lucene CAS Indexer into the sandbox

2009-03-10 Thread Jörn Kottmann
Hello everyone, I also vote +1 but the code has to be improved before I would vote +1 for a release. Especially the exception handling should make use of javas managed exceptions and in one place a I saw some code which was copied over and over again. Jörn On Mar 4, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Thilo