Re: Enhancement to XMI deserializer as a foundation for remote parallel processing

2007-02-22 Thread Michael Baessler
Adam Lally wrote: On 2/22/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently don't understand how the xmi:id is generated. For example we have a CAS in step 1 that is serialized with a max xmi:id of 100. Now two other remote services get this XMI document and do their processing on it and

Re: Enhancement to XMI deserializer as a foundation for remote parallel processing

2007-02-22 Thread Adam Lally
On 2/22/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently don't understand how the xmi:id is generated. For example we have a CAS in step 1 that is serialized with a max xmi:id of 100. Now two other remote services get this XMI document and do their processing on it and serialize the CAS

Re: Enhancement to XMI deserializer as a foundation for remote parallel processing

2007-02-22 Thread Michael Baessler
Adam Lally wrote: I am working on some modifications to the XMI deserializer that will allow the following scenario: 1) A CAS is serialized to XMI. 2) Copies of the XMI documents are sent to multiple remote services 3) Each remote service appends to the CAS (does not delete or modify existing st

Enhancement to XMI deserializer as a foundation for remote parallel processing

2007-02-21 Thread Adam Lally
I am working on some modifications to the XMI deserializer that will allow the following scenario: 1) A CAS is serialized to XMI. 2) Copies of the XMI documents are sent to multiple remote services 3) Each remote service appends to the CAS (does not delete or modify existing stuff) and responds w