Re: Some reorg in FsClassRegistry

2007-05-17 Thread Thilo Goetz
Marshall Schor wrote: Thilo Goetz wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: Current design has 1 instance of FsClassRegistry per Cas per View. With the redesign going on for JCas we no longer need one per View. We don't even need one per Cas. CASes in a pool, sharing the same type system, can share gene

Re: Some reorg in FsClassRegistry

2007-05-16 Thread Marshall Schor
Thilo Goetz wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: Current design has 1 instance of FsClassRegistry per Cas per View. With the redesign going on for JCas we no longer need one per View. We don't even need one per Cas. CASes in a pool, sharing the same type system, can share generators. Anyone object

Re: Some reorg in FsClassRegistry

2007-05-16 Thread Thilo Goetz
Marshall Schor wrote: Current design has 1 instance of FsClassRegistry per Cas per View. With the redesign going on for JCas we no longer need one per View. We don't even need one per Cas. CASes in a pool, sharing the same type system, can share generators. Anyone object if I change the imp

Some reorg in FsClassRegistry

2007-05-15 Thread Marshall Schor
Current design has 1 instance of FsClassRegistry per Cas per View. With the redesign going on for JCas we no longer need one per View. We don't even need one per Cas. CASes in a pool, sharing the same type system, can share generators. Anyone object if I change the impl to move the FSClassRe