Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

2008-06-23 Thread Marshall Schor
Eddie Epstein wrote: Well, the problem was nothing to do with base UIMA, rather it was due to me running "mvn package" instead of "mvn install". Not sure if this is an issue or not, but certainly not a blocking issue for release. "mvn package" stops before installing the package into the local

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

2008-06-20 Thread Eddie Epstein
Well, the problem was nothing to do with base UIMA, rather it was due to me running "mvn package" instead of "mvn install". Not sure if this is an issue or not, but certainly not a blocking issue for release. Eddie On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Eddie Epstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

2008-06-20 Thread Eddie Epstein
> > > Did you (1) first download the uima-2.2.2 (base) src distr and run mvn > install on uimaj? Um, nope :) Thanks, Eddie

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

2008-06-20 Thread Marshall Schor
Eddie Epstein wrote: Using the rc08 source package on a fresh [Linux] machine, the extended tests ran with no problem. (We need to add the eclipse run configuration for this test in the source :) There was a build problem with maven resolving 2 artifacts: Path to dependency: 1) org.apa

Re: uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

2008-06-20 Thread Eddie Epstein
Using the rc08 source package on a fresh [Linux] machine, the extended tests ran with no problem. (We need to add the eclipse run configuration for this test in the source :) There was a build problem with maven resolving 2 artifacts: Path to dependency: 1) org.apache.uima:uimaj-distr:ja

uima-as testing - testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed once, but isn't reproducable

2008-06-19 Thread Marshall Schor
When running TestUimaAsExtended junit test, the testCancelProcessAggregateWithRemoteMultiplier failed. But when rerunning, it ran OK. The failure was a resource initialization exception. Anyone else see this intermittant failure? -Marshall

Re: uima-as testing

2008-06-19 Thread Eddie Epstein
Derby is not being used with the default configuration; at least I have deleted the derby jar file and run with no problem. The JVM parameter is just specifying where derby should write files, if it happens to be called. The JMX figures look like EEG scans of an AMQ broker in dream state :) Eddie

Re: uima-as testing

2008-06-19 Thread Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it "idle" (i.e., no uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can see there is no memory lea

Re: uima-as testing

2008-06-19 Thread Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote: Marshall Schor wrote: After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it "idle" (i.e., no uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can see there is no memory leaks. There is some beha

Re: uima-as testing

2008-06-19 Thread Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote: After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it "idle" (i.e., no uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can see there is no memory leaks. There is some behavior that I don't unde

uima-as testing

2008-06-19 Thread Marshall Schor
After running some tests on uima-as on a clean windows machine, I connected a jmx console to the broker and watched it "idle" (i.e., no uima activity was running) for several hours, overnight, and can see there is no memory leaks. There is some behavior that I don't understand, though - I'm wo