Re: [uknof] Recent Threats from a Group calling themslves DD4BC

2015-06-18 Thread Richard Halfpenny
On 18/06/2015 13:26, James Blessing wrote: > > > On 18 June 2015 at 13:21, Greg Choules > wrote: > > All. What does anyone know about a group called DD4BC? > > We at Three are starting to hear some worrying stories about what > they claim to be

Re: [uknof] Recent Threats from a Group calling themslves DD4BC

2015-06-18 Thread James Blessing
On 18 June 2015 at 13:21, Greg Choules wrote: > All. What does anyone know about a group called DD4BC? > > We at Three are starting to hear some worrying stories about what they > claim to be capable of and would like to try and gather/share as much > intel’ as we can with the community to bolst

[uknof] Recent Threats from a Group calling themslves DD4BC

2015-06-18 Thread Greg Choules
All. What does anyone know about a group called DD4BC? We at Three are starting to hear some worrying stories about what they claim to be capable of and would like to try and gather/share as much intel' as we can with the community to bolster our defences, to protect ourselves should the need ar

Re: [uknof] CE-PE IGP

2015-06-18 Thread Neil J. McRae
Yes we have this scenario also but unfortunately it doesn't cover every use case (esp on fast failover and/or mixed carrier setups). Cheers, Neil Sent from my iPhone On 18 Jun 2015, at 10:01, Alistair C mailto:uk...@imf2000.org>> wrote: On 18 June 2015 at 02:01, Neil J. McRae mailto:n...@dom

Re: [uknof] CE-PE IGP

2015-06-18 Thread Alistair C
On 18 June 2015 at 10:06, David Freedman wrote: > > So I take it you've never come across (or never sold to) a customer > who needs OSPF interaction with your network between sites (I.e, they want > you to do layer 3 services, *and* participate in / bridge their backbone > area, because they

Re: [uknof] CE-PE IGP

2015-06-18 Thread David Freedman
>Have examples of larger customers requiring to speak EIGRP/OSPF, in our case, >we handle re-distribution on the CE and maintain a common design for PE-CE >using BGP across different access media. So I take it you've never come across (or never sold to) a customer who needs OSPF interaction wi

Re: [uknof] CE-PE IGP

2015-06-18 Thread Alistair C
On 18 June 2015 at 02:01, Neil J. McRae wrote: > Depends on your segment. > > In the larger enterprises many of them run EIGRP and need you to run it, > this is (was) a pain as if your edge device wasn't Cisco you ended up > having to put a layer of Cisco 26/36 devices to do redistribution. I've