Re: [uknof] Investigatory Powers Act

2017-01-14 Thread Adrian Farrel
> believe that it would be an offence under the Act to disclose the fact that one > had received a retention notice, because that's how they're worded. You are, I believe, allowed to stop disclosing that you haven't received a retention notice since stopping such a disclosure is not saying that y

Re: [uknof] Investigatory Powers Act

2016-12-04 Thread Adrian Farrel
Neil J. McRae may have said... > In my view that’s not what is expected. Of course, it’s all an opinion until > tested. I suggest common sense applies until someone says it doesn’t. Oh my, didn't we cross that threshold a while back? Adrian

[uknof] BT Outage?

2016-07-20 Thread Adrian Farrel
Any news on today's BT outage? My ISP is heartily blaming this for all sorts of ills. Adrian

Re: [uknof] Fwd: Fwd: Fwd: W3C/IAB workshop on Strengthening the Internet Against Pervasive Monitoring (STRINT)

2014-01-16 Thread Adrian Farrel
Neil J. McRae may have wrote... > Interesting arms race you are creating here! Whilst I think the goal is > honourable it looks very difficult and expensive to achieve but I do like > a challenging problem. On the subject of arms race, yes, indeed. And other solutions would be more acceptable. I

[uknof] Easyspace having a bad day?

2013-09-14 Thread Adrian Farrel
Or so I hear from their hosted customers

[uknof] Registration for September

2013-08-03 Thread Adrian Farrel
FWIW, I just registered and was confused by the "early bird free with donation" option. Sounded like it was what I wanted, but when I followed through I could not see it as "registration". Looked like "donation only". Probably a victim of spending the week at the IETF and cannot now see straight.

[uknof] UKNOF23, Agenda

2012-09-29 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hello Keith, > I'm pleased to say we also have a very full slate of speakers - a draft > agenda will be posted later this week. How much later? ;-) Seriously, thanks for the work in organising. Adrian

[uknof] FW: PIM survey for operators (round 2)

2012-09-24 Thread Adrian Farrel
Heads-up. The IETF PIM working group is re-running its survey (owing to a snafu). Please contribute responses even if you did (or did not) contribute before. Thanks, Adrian > -Original Message- > From: pim-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pim-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stig > Venaas > Sent:

[uknof] FW: PIM survey for operators

2012-06-26 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi UKnoffers, In case this doesn't reach you by other means, the IETF PIM community is seeking input on PIM deployments. Your responses can be anonymised as described in the covering email. Thanks for any help. Adrian > -Original Message- > From: pim-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pim-boun...

Re: [uknof] Pirate Bay Block

2012-05-01 Thread Adrian Farrel
fine. This morning, everything seems to be back to normal. Adrian > -Original Message- > From: Steve Dyer [mailto:st...@enovi.com] > Sent: 30 April 2012 22:16 > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk > Cc: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk > Subject: Re: [uknof] Pirate Bay Block > > On

[uknof] Pirate Bay Block

2012-04-30 Thread Adrian Farrel
It's very quiet here on the subject. What news? Adrian

Re: [uknof] 6UK Launch Event: 11th Nov

2010-11-08 Thread Adrian Farrel
An interesting initiative. Will be interested to hear more. Almost perfect timing to set this up when the IETF is meeting in Beijing thus precluding attendance at the event by some of the folk leading the technology. Typing this from a plenary meeting that is discussing v4v6 transition issues and