On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Thomas Mangin said:
>> Since the day cleanfeed was announced, it was easy to predict that one day
>> cleanfeed like systems would be used for doing more than "saving the
>> children".
>
> And at the time BT gave ISPA and LINX an underta
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
>
> On 06/09/2011 10:48, "Ben Laurie" wrote:
>
>
>>Just because there is a problem it does not mean there is a solution :-)
>
> I love your honesty! :-)
>
>>In general, my approach to key-si
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Matthew Walster wrote:
>
>
> On 6 September 2011 10:55, Ben Laurie wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I think it is very different. In particular, PGP keys are
>> useful when associated with an online identity - normally represented
>> by an
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Neil J. McRae wrote:
>
>
> On 6 Sep 2011, at 09:29, "Ben Laurie" wrote:
>> a) Who cares? PGP is for email and other online transactions, your
>> government (or whatever) issued ID is irrelevant.
>
> How do you propose we check
ho killed himself a
couple of months ago.
However, that's not my issue: my issue is "proof of identity".
a) Who cares? PGP is for email and other online transactions, your
government (or whatever) issued ID is irrelevant.
b) Who is qualified to check such documents?
> Matthew
Who will be verifying the proof of identity?
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Matthew Walster wrote:
> Just a quick note for those interested in the PGP keysigning.
> If you're planning on attending the keysigning, please print off the signing
> list [1] and bring it along to the meeting. This wil
