ve.
scott
--- n...@domino.org wrote:
From: "Neil J. McRae"
To: "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" ,
"sur...@mauigateway.com"
Subject: Re: [uknof] Parental Controls - Who’s Responsible?
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:38:21 +
Where do you get this surveil nonsense from
inline
Neil J. McRae wrote:
> Where do you get this surveil nonsense from? how is that linked? You are
> trying to position your (religious?) ideology with something completely
> unrelated, I'm struggling as to why?!
>
> Parents voted for a government with a manifesto to make it harder for porn
10:38
To: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk; sur...@mauigateway.com
Subject: Re: [uknof] Parental Controls - Who’s Responsible?
Where do you get this surveil nonsense from? how is that linked? You are trying
to position your (religious?) ideology with something completely unrelated, I'm
struggling
Where do you get this surveil nonsense from? how is that linked? You are trying
to position your (religious?) ideology with something completely unrelated, I'm
struggling as to why?!
Parents voted for a government with a manifesto to make it harder for porn to
be made available to children (bot
This has been an interesting and educative thread.
Is there any reason apart from cost and communication / training skills
for ISPs to provide the frameworks to support their customers to self
govern their family access?
I've seen many organisations setup in the UK since the early 2000s with
the
The issues Paul talks about are societal ones. We are moving towards a point
where all responsibility is removed. I think this deviates too far from the
original topic.
The most important part of this, according to many studies and psychologists is
parental involvement, we should be talking to
--- paul+uk...@mansfield.co.uk wrote:
From: Paul Mansfield
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 23:12, Bill wrote:
> Having said that we as a community should be helping them find
> and use the tools needed to do this.
...but few parents are technically savvy enough to use them even
if they wanted to. Thos
Paul Mansfield wrote:
>
> TL;DR: we can give the parents a great set of tools to control their
> children's internal access, but few parents are technically savvy
> enough to use them even if they wanted to. Those who do will fight
> with their children due to false positive blocking, and be worn
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 23:12, Bill wrote:
> Having said that we as a community should be helping them find and use the
> tools needed to do this.
TL;DR: we can give the parents a great set of tools to control their
children's internal access, but few parents are technically savvy
enough to use t
Hi Catalin,
Your comments don’t only apply to technology, from my discussions with schools
the issue you raise is across the board.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 23/04/2019, at 19:42, Catalin Dominte wrote:
>
> If I may interject here slightly. As a father myself, what I noticed is that
> quite
If I may interject here slightly. As a father myself, what I noticed is that
quite a lot of parents are under the impression that education happens only in
school and after school clubs. Very few parents spend the required TIME to
educate their children and explain to them the responsibility an
--- b...@wjw.nz wrote:
From: Bill
We don’t need more rules and regulation we need more education.
Yes! And this is where the gov't can help. They could create
public service announcements, work groups, etc to reach out to
the communities an
As a parent, network engineer and techie. First and foremost protecting children
Is the parents responsibility.
Having said that we as a community should be helping them find and use the
tools needed to do this.
Even as a techie it wasn’t easy to ensure I can monitor what my kids are doing
on
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, April 22, 2019 10:31 AM, Hal Ponton wrote:
> I’m talking about restricting what they can see online
The first problem straight off the bat is that any tech ISPs put in place to
restrict/protect children is/has been co-opted for general Internet censor
--- n...@domino.org wrote:
From: "Neil J. McRae"
> On 22 Apr 2019, at 18:22, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> No, you mentioned the government above. They DO NOT obviously
> have a role to play here unless something illegal is going on.
Something illegal is going on though isn’t it?
-
> On 22 Apr 2019, at 18:22, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> No, you mentioned the government above. They DO NOT obviously
> have a role to play here unless something illegal is going on.
Something illegal is going on though isn’t it?
> Otherwise they should keep out as their decisions will hinder
> f
This plays right into government's hands like it's inevitable
they will surveil/censor everything. For the sake of the
children, of course. Oh yeah, terrorists, too...
--- h...@buzcom.net wrote:
From: Hal Ponton
The legislation regarding Age Verification on
Hi All,
The legislation regarding Age Verification online is due to come into force
shortly. I’ve been doing some thinking around the subject, regarding where
responsibility lies with protecting what children can view online. Having seen
some discussion on Twitter its prompted me to write thi
18 matches
Mail list logo
