I am using some Juniper SRX240 as PE nodes and running the Internet in VRF.
I have two Juniper MX5 MP-BGP route reflectors which also receive the full
internet table plus default into VRF and export just my local routes (BGP and
direct) and a default route (BGP) into the VRF.
The problem I have
On 28/Apr/16 11:31, Paul Bone wrote:
> I am using some Juniper SRX240 as PE nodes and running the Internet in
> VRF.
>
>
>
> I have two Juniper MX5 MP-BGP route reflectors which also receive the
> full internet table plus default into VRF and export just my local
> routes (BGP and direct) and
Paul Bone wrote:
> The problem I have is that the SRX240 is receiving the default route
> from both route reflectors but is actually preferring and forwarding
> traffic to the route reflector with the lowest router ID (show route
> detail confirms this) and ignoring the underlying IGP metrics from
appears to be a difference between IOS and Junos.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Sent: 28 April 2016 13:55
To: Paul Bone
Cc: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk
Subject: Re: [uknof] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
Paul Bone wrote:
> The problem I have is t
On 28 April 2016 at 10:31, Paul Bone wrote:
>
> I am using some Juniper SRX240 as PE nodes and running the Internet in VRF.
>
>
>
> I have two Juniper MX5 MP-BGP route reflectors which also receive the full
> internet table plus default into VRF and export just my local routes (BGP and
> direct)
: [uknof] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
On 28 April 2016 at 10:31, Paul Bone wrote:
>
> I am using some Juniper SRX240 as PE nodes and running the Internet in VRF.
>
>
>
> I have two Juniper MX5 MP-BGP route reflectors which also receive the full
> internet table plus default int
On 28 April 2016 at 14:52, Paul Bone wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> We are using LDP and that looks like it will solve my problem.
>
> Will enabling this cause any network outage?
>
> Best regards, Paul
>
I've never tried configuring it with sessions already established. I'd
be surprised if it caused them
] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
On 28 April 2016 at 14:52, Paul Bone wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> We are using LDP and that looks like it will solve my problem.
>
> Will enabling this cause any network outage?
>
> Best regards, Paul
>
I've never tried configuring it with session
Paul Bone wrote:
> We are quite a small service provider and have just expanded our MPLS
> and the issue was not seen before - is it common to use an anycast
> address as default route destination then?
No idea how common it is in the wider context, but I've used it
routinely for some years and wi
Bone
Sent: 28 April 2016 10:31
To: uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk
Subject: [uknof] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
I am using some Juniper SRX240 as PE nodes and running the Internet in VRF.
I have two Juniper MX5 MP-BGP route reflectors which also receive the full
internet table plus default into VR
route reflectors so can
optimise the routing further with this.
Best regards, Paul
From: Stuart Howlette [mailto:stu...@outlook.com]
Sent: 29 April 2016 06:29
To: Ian Tomkins ; Paul Bone
; uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk
Subject: Re: [uknof] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
This is my guess, both
Stuart
From: uknof on behalf of Ian Tomkins
Date: Thursday, 28 April 2016 at 17:16
To: Paul Bone , "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk"
Subject: Re: [uknof] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
I’m not sure this is relevant to you but I thought I would mention that there
is also a trick you ca
drus.com>>; Paul
Bone mailto:paul.b...@bridgefibre.co.uk>>;
uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk<mailto:uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [uknof] Juniper SRX as PE Node Problem
This is my guess, both routes reach the route reflector, but it is making a
best path decision before a
13 matches
Mail list logo
