Yes, you got it right... do you see a problem with this?
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Oguz Yarimtepe wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:40:25 -0300
> Adriano Marques wrote:
>
> > Use SQLite. Will make your life so much less miserable than creating a
> file
> > format to deal with stuff.
>
> Ar
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:40:25 -0300
Adriano Marques wrote:
> Use SQLite. Will make your life so much less miserable than creating a file
> format to deal with stuff.
Are we talking about keeping the header information of the packet at the
SQLite? IP, port, flags, etc, payload data. And the centr
Hi Oguz,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Oguz Yarimtepe wrote:
> Although i already applied Site Status project and quiete happy about it,
> I find the DiPAC project also interesting. I checked the UMPA, read the
> examples. The examples reminded me Scapy. I am planning to submit a
> proposal t
Although i already applied Site Status project and quiete happy about it, I
find the DiPAC project also interesting. I checked the UMPA, read the examples.
The examples reminded me Scapy. I am planning to submit a proposal that has
asynchronous communication solution. I have some part that i nee
