Re: DHCP for Z_PATH

On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 05:03:46PM -0400, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote: > "Patrick J. LoPresti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hm. If we are going to steal a local DHCP option anyway, maybe we > > should only take one but give it this syntax: > > > > z_user=... z_pass=... z_path=... > > OK,

Re: Bugs with 4.1

Jordan Share <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm pretty sure that the boot disk I am using is MSDOS based. Ah, yes > it is: > strings command.com | grep 6.2 > Microsoft(R) MS-DOS(R) Version 6.20 > > Isn't this the one that comes with 3.5? Did any versions of > Unattended use a MSDOS based disk?

Re: Autoit Update

Adam Peart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > They now have a new version of Autoit, and it's a lot more user > friendly as well as has more features to it. It also now has the > capability to create shortcuts. Nice, but I want to get 4.1 out the door and this is too big of a change. We will put thi

Re: DHCP for Z_PATH

"Patrick J. LoPresti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hm. If we are going to steal a local DHCP option anyway, maybe we > should only take one but give it this syntax: > > z_user=... z_pass=... z_path=... OK, I implemented this. After various Googling, I settled on DHCP option 233. The chan

Unattended 4.1-rc1

Unattended 4.1 "release candidate 1" is now available for testing. You may download it from . If you have time to try it out over the next day or two, we would appreciate it. Shad is doing regression testing now; when he finishes in the next few days, w

Re: DHCP for Z_PATH

Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've just been trying out the new Linux bootdisk with Unattended > 4.0b, and it rocks longer and harder than ever. Thanks! Allowing DHCP options has been a goal from the beginning. Thank you for doing the legwork on this. > From the manpage, it appe

DHCP for Z_PATH

I've just been trying out the new Linux bootdisk with Unattended 4.0b, and it rocks longer and harder than ever. My one problem at the moment is trying to make it even more unattended. I know I can put the relevant options on the kernel boot command line, but I'd *love* it if unattended could get