Allan Lyons wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:21:44PM +1000, Tim Bates wrote:
>
>
>> I have all ours set to create a full drive partition. The failures don't
>> seem to have any pattern beyond being mostly the newer PCs.
>>
>
> What type of comp
On 8/07/2009 7:51 PM, Pierre Bourgin wrote:
> Tim Bates a écrit :
>> On 8/07/2009 5:00 PM, insrc wrote:
>>> Yep, i'm glad that dosemu is still there as i can't do unattended
>>> installation with nt5x-install method
>> Same... In our case, the dosemu w
On 8/07/2009 5:00 PM, insrc wrote:
> Yep, i'm glad that dosemu is still there as i can't do unattended
> installation with nt5x-install method
Same... In our case, the dosemu works on all our computers, but the nt5x
method seems to fail on a few of the newer ones. It does it's thing, but
once it
Werner Maes wrote:
> is dosemu still included for people who do not use nt5xinstall?
It seems to be. I used it this morning when I got piles of file copy
errors after using the nt5xinstall method (turns out the test box I was
using as dosemu did exactly the same).
If this release has the Intel 8
This is probably the same issues being discussed about the tftpboot.
The thread was titled "Re: how to make tftpboot (with reply to ML of
Unattended too)".
There's a list of steps in one of the posts in that thread, and it
should be available in the list archives. You may need to grab a Ubuntu
li
Johannes Bauer wrote:
> 1. The NIC of my PC is not supported by Windows, I have to install a
> driver. However I'd have to do that before the post-install starts
> (which wants to access //unattended/...) - is there a way to slipstream
> network drivers?
Yes. Read this article instead of the txtset
This was one of my problems yesterday (I'm using Ubuntu 8.10 though).
Haven't heard any solutions yet.
I tried using a newer release of glibc than the download specified, but
that died compiling too.
TB
Allan Lyons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build from CVS on a Debian Lenny system with make
Paul Griffith wrote:
> First of all, I run into this issue after I had rebuild the linux boot
> disk. I needed a updated e1000e driver to support the Intel DQ45CB
> motherboard so I had to use the e1000e driver from 2.26.28.rc7.
Ah crap! Guess what issue I was going to try and fix today :-(
I
Pierre Bourgin wrote:
> The advantages should be:
>
> - really comfortable to find easily the right (or good candidate) drivers
> for the whole hardware platform to install
>
> - really quick: compute take 10s to parse the whole driverPacks.net driver
> collection
>
> - reduce drastically the a
Is the current setup to allow anonymous edits? If so, simply dropping
that would probably help.
If you already did that, then do what you think is necessary. I don't
think there's all that many people contributing to the wiki anyway, is
there?
TB
Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit ti
kevin wrote:
> Here's what I did. I took XP Gold (SP0) and integrated SP3. Then I
> took XP Gold (SP0) and integrated SP2***, then integrated SP3. There
> are 13 files that SP2 updated, which SP3 didn't. Now, these files may
> or may not be needed in SP3 anymore, but just looking at them I d
>Do anyone know if installing kb888111 on a system without HDA "hurts"?
>
It's effectively just a driver from memory. If it's the one I'm thinking
of, I extracted it and put it as another driver in the 3rd party driver
collection on my unattended (if you get what I mean).
It works fine on all ou
12 matches
Mail list logo
