Russell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your waiting for the driver to initialize an get it's head together.
> It takes this amount of time for the Broadcom card to get the Link
> up and running properly. the Driver RX/TX lines come up after the
> DHCP requests. At least that's what I'm wait
On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:11 am, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> Russell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi Pat, and All other devs :)
>
> Hey, Russ. Good to see you again :-).
>
> > 1. When using the Broadcom NetXtreme 1000 Card (I Think that's it)
> > the DHCP on udhcpc is still too fast if you
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:46:59, Scott Frazer wrote:
Hi,
> >> 1. When using the Broadcom NetXtreme 1000 Card (I Think that's it)
> the
> >> DHCP on udhcpc is still too fast if you plug the machine into a fast
> >> port (100/1000). Can we adjust the script to either try DHCP after a
>
> >> 5
>> 1. When using the Broadcom NetXtreme 1000 Card (I Think that's it)
the
>> DHCP on udhcpc is still too fast if you plug the machine into a fast
>> port (100/1000). Can we adjust the script to either try DHCP after a
>> 5 second wait, maybe in a loop? or increase that sanity time before
>> a
Russell Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Pat, and All other devs :)
Hey, Russ. Good to see you again :-).
> 1. When using the Broadcom NetXtreme 1000 Card (I Think that's it)
> the DHCP on udhcpc is still too fast if you plug the machine into a
> fast port (100/1000). Can we adjust the s
Hi Pat, and All other devs :)
I've been using 4.1 with the linux boot disk to solve this stupid Broadcom
issues. And a couple of this have come up, even though this release is a
good one.
1. When using the Broadcom NetXtreme 1000 Card (I Think that's it) the DHCP
on udhcpc is still too fast
