Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

2015-09-09 Thread Juanjo Pablos
Hi, This change does not work on Windows XP. We need to split adobe-reader.bat into x86-adobe-reader.bat and AMD64-adobereader.bat what do you think? El 09/09/15 a las 13:20, Unattended, A Windows deployment system SVN repository escribió: > > Adobe Reader DC (v12), new file. > > By mythrix on

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

2015-09-09 Thread Johan Ho
Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called AcroRd32.exe. I'm guessing DC just checks the OS version when installing and stops if it's not at least Windows 7. That's why I thought it was just as well to cal

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

2015-09-09 Thread Juanjo Pablos
El 09/09/15 a las 15:41, Johan Ho escribió: > Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is > installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called > AcroRd32.exe. I did notice just on the XP machines, I do not know. > I'm guessing DC just checks the OS version when

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

2015-11-04 Thread Johan Ho
Den 10.09.2015 02.23, skrev Juanjo Pablos: > El 09/09/15 a las 15:41, Johan Ho escribió: >> Huh, but the DC/12 version of Adobe Reader is also 32-bit? It is >> installed in %PROGRAMFILES(x86)% and the executable is also called >> AcroRd32.exe. > I did notice just on the XP machines, I do not know.

Re: [Unattended-Dev] [unattended:code] New commit by mythrix

2015-11-04 Thread Juanjo Pablos
El 04/11/15 a las 09:25, Johan Ho escribió: > Anyways, to be honest I'm not overly impressed by DC / v12. There are a > few "premium function" buttons that nags people to buy the "full version"... > > Maybe it would be good to give people the option to choose which version > they want? That is why