On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2005, 19:32 +0100 schrieb Wim Vandersmissen:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
For those that want to test unattended in a virtual machine and dont
get it to work with VMware, I
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2005, 19:32 +0100 schrieb Wim Vandersmissen:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
For those that want to test unattended in a virtual machine and dont
get it to work with VMware, I
-info@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Unattended] RE: unattended + qemu + kqemu = success ;)
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 09:49:44PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2005, 19:32 +0100 schrieb Wim Vandersmissen:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote
For those that want to test unattended in a virtual machine and dont
get it to work with VMware, I advise to try Qemu and the recently released
KQemu module. (http://www.qemu.org)
Very fast and best of all it works with the unattended linuxboot/dosemu (and
it has snapshot support!)
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
For those that want to test unattended in a virtual machine and dont
get it to work with VMware, I advise to try Qemu and the recently released
KQemu module. (http://www.qemu.org)
Very fast and best of all it works with the
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2005, 19:32 +0100 schrieb Wim Vandersmissen:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Mario Gzuk wrote:
For those that want to test unattended in a virtual machine and dont
get it to work with VMware, I advise to try Qemu and the recently
released
KQemu
