Hello -I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out. The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes just about 3 1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Office, hotfixes, and a few other applicat
Nelson Witten wrote, Am 19.01.2006 20:50:
> Hello -
>
> I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
> The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
> takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
> just about 3 1/2 hours to install
> I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
> The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
> takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
> just about 3 1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Office, hotfixes, and a
> few other appli
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
For me it takes about an hour to install XP + Office + many apps (no hotfixes
though - they get downloaded later, automatically, anyway), on a 100 Mbit
network.
For me: The fixes are taking most of the time, because of the regular
reboots.
Bye
Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
For me it takes about an hour to install XP + Office + many apps (no
hotfixes though - they get downloaded later, automatically, anyway),
on a 100 Mbit network.
For me: The fixes are taking most of the time, because of th
> Same here as well.. its the reboots on the updates that slows it down...
> I wonder if using a WSUS server might help things here...
> Brett
There is no salvation of the updates part if you do it the classic way. The
possible solutions are slipstreaming and patch integration or moving to
somethin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Same here as well.. its the reboots on the updates that slows it down...
I wonder if using a WSUS server might help things here...
Brett
There is no salvation of the updates part if you do it the classic way. The
possible solutions are slipstreaming and patch integr
> Comparatively I can use our RIS system or use
> RIPREP images and rebuild a system in about an hour.
Imaging will always be faster than a native install. If you are looking
for the fastest way to deploy an OS, it doesn't get any faster then
imaging.
I think you also have to weigh your time ver
Nelson Witten wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
> The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
> takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
> just about 3 1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Office,
Hi Nelson,
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out. The
only downside I see with the project is the length of time it takes to
install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes just about 3
1/2 hours to install Windows XP, Of
> ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
> unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
> just haven't noticed?
I think there is an AutoIT script for it. 2005 seems to install fairly
nicely with just some parameters passed to it.
Brad Erdman
Univer
Jan Tietjen wrote:
Hi Nelson,
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just about 3 1/2 hours to in
Adam Peart wrote:
Jan Tietjen wrote:
Hi Nelson,
Nelson Witten wrote:
Hello -
I recently got the unattended system going in a lab to test it out.
The only downside I see with the project is the length of time it
takes to install the OS and applications. For my situation it takes
just ab
Jan Tietjen wrote:
I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing are the missing
languages supported by this tool.
The only point was that Autopatcher installs all the updates, then
reboots after they are all installed
---
This SF.
> Not quite right.
>
> I do not only _removed_ ".reboot-on 194" but _replaced_ it with
> ".ignore-error 194" so the install will not fail!
>
> My goal was to use everything the "unattended way" except the reboot
> mania with the updates.
>
> I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing are t
> Not quite right.
>
> I do not only _removed_ ".reboot-on 194" but _replaced_ it with
> ".ignore-error 194" so the install will not fail!
>
> My goal was to use everything the "unattended way" except the reboot
> mania with the updates.
>
> I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one thing are t
It should be "ignore-err 194" not "ignore-error 194"
Good Luck
Christian Abels
Application Developer, Information Technology - Shipco Transport
For IT support related issues, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Artturi Kyrömies wrote:
Not quite right.
I do not only _removed_ ".reboot-on 194"
Artturi Kyrömies wrote:
Not quite right.
I do not only _removed_ ".reboot-on 194" but _replaced_ it with
".ignore-error 194" so the install will not fail!
My goal was to use everything the "unattended way" except the reboot
mania with the updates.
I can not see how Autopatcher fits in... one t
Hi Artturi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am 07.02.06 15:38:14:
>
>
> > Not quite right.
> >
> > I do not only _removed_ ".reboot-on 194" but _replaced_ it with
> > ".ignore-error 194" so the install will not fail!
> >
> > My goal was to use everything the "unattended way" except the reboot
> > mani
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Artturi Kyrömies enlightened us:
> ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
> unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
> just haven't noticed?
I'm doing it, but it's a bit hackish. It seems the main install
Sigh, reading the Unattended documentation I discovered the correct
syntax is ".ignore-err 194", forget about this.
--
Artturi Kyrömies
--- Begin Message ---
> Not quite right.
>
> I do not only _removed_ ".reboot-on 194" but _replaced_ it with
> ".ignore-error 194" so the install will not fail!
On Tue, 24 Jan, 2006 at 08:39:47 -0500, Matt Hyclak wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:23:52PM +0200, Artturi Kyrömies enlightened us:
> > ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
> > unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
> > just haven't notice
> ps. anyone found a way to install Visual Studio .NET 2003 with
> unattended, or is there already a script in the cvs/wiki somewhere I
> just haven't noticed?
We used to use this here to install visual studio 2003 I believe.
http://ubertechnique.com/unattended/MS_Visual_Studio_2003
We now use t
23 matches
Mail list logo
