Nils Olav Fossum wrote:
> One thing.. how big is youre disk?
> It may bee that the partition is simply too big to place a formatted FAT
> filesystem on..
> It is probably better to make a 4GB FAT32 partition and let windows increase
> it while it converts it into NTFS.
Looks like this might hav
Torsdag 12 juni 2008 01:47, skrev Brian May:
> Brian May wrote:
> > convert_fdisk_parted(...) has a lot of debug print statements, where
> > does the output from these go?
>
> Me blind.
>
> Anyway, it translates:
>
> fdisk_cmds="fdisk /clear 1;fdisk /pri:100,100;fdisk /activate:1"
>
> into
>
> part
Brian May wrote:
> Maybe this is a bug in the old version of parted?
New version of parted has the same issue.
Brian May
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just
Brian May wrote:
> convert_fdisk_parted(...) has a lot of debug print statements, where
> does the output from these go?
Me blind.
Anyway, it translates:
fdisk_cmds="fdisk /clear 1;fdisk /pri:100,100;fdisk /activate:1"
into
parted -s /dev/dsk -- mklabel msdos
parted -s /dev/dsk -- mkpartfs pr
Nils Olav Fossum wrote:
> format_cmd= is the only thing thats dosemu/dosfloppy specific,
> its simply ignored by nt5x-install.
> The rest is done by install.pl
Ok, I think I see it:
foreach my $cmd (split /;/, $fdisk_cmds) {
$is_fdisk = 1;
system ($is_linux
? convert_fdi
Tirsdag 10 juni 2008 08:32, skrev Brian May:
> Nils Olav Fossum wrote:
> > The filesystem is created by parted, (or it should be..)
> > Partition and filesystem creation is done from install.pl (namely
> > the "fdisk_cmds =" ...)
> > From youre parted printout you do not have a formatted filesystem
Nils Olav Fossum wrote:
> The filesystem is created by parted, (or it should be..)
> Partition and filesystem creation is done from install.pl (namely
> the "fdisk_cmds =" ...)
> From youre parted printout you do not have a formatted filesystem.
> It should say fat32 under "Filesystem".
Hmmm...
Tirsdag 10 juni 2008 01:50, skrev Brian May:
> Michael De Groote wrote:
> > output of fdisk -l ?
>
> fdisk isn't installed on the unattended installation (not that I can
> find anywhere).
>
> The output of parted looks fine to me though:
>
> bash-3.2# parted /dev/sda
> [ copyright message
>
> Using
Michael De Groote wrote:
> output of fdisk -l ?
fdisk isn't installed on the unattended installation (not that I can
find anywhere).
The output of parted looks fine to me though:
bash-3.2# parted /dev/sda
[ copyright message
Using /dev/sda
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/sda: 0.000-23847
output of fdisk -l ?
Michael
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael De Groote wrote:
> > does /c exist ?
>
> Unfortunately, Yes. It looks fine to me.
>
> Brian May
>
>
> -
> Check out
Michael De Groote wrote:
> does /c exist ?
Unfortunately, Yes. It looks fine to me.
Brian May
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
does /c exist ?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 4:13 AM, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian May wrote:
>
> > Last time I tried unattended installation, using nt5x-install, mount
> > refused to mount the filesystem (Invalid Argument).
> >
> > Where is the filesystem created? I couldn't find it...
Brian May wrote:
> Last time I tried unattended installation, using nt5x-install, mount
> refused to mount the filesystem (Invalid Argument).
>
> Where is the filesystem created? I couldn't find it... Unless parted
> does that?
Am I really the only one to encounter this problem???
copied by h
Brian May wrote:
> Last time I tried unattended installation, using nt5x-install, mount
> refused to mount the filesystem (Invalid Argument).
>
> Where is the filesystem created? I couldn't find it... Unless parted
> does that?
Am I really the only one to encounter this problem???
copied by h
Hello,
Last time I tried unattended installation, using nt5x-install, mount
refused to mount the filesystem (Invalid Argument).
Where is the filesystem created? I couldn't find it... Unless parted
does that?
I changed to the dosemu installer and it worked fine (well almost, see
my next email
>
>thanks, nice info for the 'what version works with what' -record.
>
>You can find the patches here:
>http://norbakkinn.net/unattended/
>
>Its on my home adsl line, Im using it so it my be slooow :-)
>
>
>
Thank you.
I downloaded this 4 files.
I'll Monday how to do
Régis
--
===
Fredag 28 mars 2008 16:45, skrev Regis Gras:
> Nils Olav Fossum wrote:
> >I got this exact error when compiling with a too new glibc :-)
> >Try changing the glibc version:
> >glibc=glibc-2.3.6
> >In the Makefile
> >
> >What distribution and version are you using?
> My computer works with Fedora Co
17 matches
Mail list logo
