RE: [Unattended] questions

> > > This depends only on your server. If it is capable to serve 50 > > > simultaneous, Unattended will do. If you use an old Pentium > > > server, you will have trouble to serve more than one clients at a > > > time. > > > > I don't really think it matters how fast your machine is this case

RE: [Unattended] questions

Hi Brad! > > This depends only on your server. If it is capable to serve 50 > > simultaneous, Unattended will do. If you use an old pentium > > server,you will have trouble to serve more than one clients at > > a time. > > I don't really think it matters how fast your machine is this case. > Una

Re: [Unattended] questions

On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 01:33:30AM +, Mark H. wrote: > Question 1. Is your system designed to unattend install small amounts > of clients, or would it work well with say, 50 simultaneous clients? I > ask because I routinely multicast large amounts of clients. I've done a little over 80 works

RE: [Unattended] questions

> Hi Mark! > > > Question 1. Is your system designed to unattend install small amounts > > of clients, or would it work well with say, 50 simultaneous clients? I > > ask because I routinely multicast large amounts of clients. > > This depends only on your server. If it is capable to serve 50 > si

Re[2]: [Unattended] questions

ted using unattended. James Stein Reply Separator____ Subject: Re: [Unattended] questions Author: "Niels S. Richthof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2/2/2005 12:20 PM Hi Mark! > Question 1. Is your system designed to unattend install s

Re: [Unattended] questions

Hi Mark! > Question 1. Is your system designed to unattend install small amounts > of clients, or would it work well with say, 50 simultaneous clients? I > ask because I routinely multicast large amounts of clients. This depends only on your server. If it is capable to serve 50 simultaneous, U

Re: [Unattended] questions

Mark H. schrieb, Am 02.02.2005 02:33: [...] >Question 1. Is your system designed to unattend install small amounts >of clients, or would it work well with say, 50 simultaneous clients? I >ask because I routinely multicast large amounts of clients. > Hello Mark, I don't know if my experiences a

RE: [Unattended] questions

Hi; > This system looks like a good alternative, though, it seems a bit > complex to me at first glance. After some barriers (linux,perl,iso,etc) is magic. Combined with vmware for make tests is amazing. In few seconds is possible rebuild bootdisks and test inmediately. > Question 2. Does this

[Unattended] questions

This system looks like a good alternative, though, it seems a bit complex to me at first glance. I've been using Imagecast for a few years and have found it's great for 9x but with 2000/XP clients, it gets a bid ridiculous having to re- image them for small changes. Question 1. Is your

Re: [Unattended] questions - Julien Touche

Ziad O'Hanlon a écrit : "program parted is using a deprecated SCSI ioctl, please convert it to SG_IO" How did you get rid of this message? I've got the same problem on a Dell Precision 670. unsolved for now. (i didn't get it with 4.4b if i remember well) Regards Julien ---

[Unattended] questions

some other points on 4.5 * for the updates (mostly system or office), it will be best to have a mechanism in todo.pl to check the exe exist and make an alert WITHOUT stopping full install. it would be mostly useful for localized updates. example: for now: my install stop on winxpsp1-updates because

[Unattended] Questions about Configurations.

Hi I am working to get Unattended 4.4b setup on my network. I am in an environment where we tend to put a lot of servers online which is going to be the primary use for Unattended. We also wish to use Unattended (becase it will make life easier :) ) for new employee desktop setups. My questio

RE: [Unattended] questions

> has someone done a list of services which can be disabled by > default like: > policyagent, ssdpsrv, w32time (use net time to sync), > iisadmin, w3svc, smtpsvc, msdtc , messenger enventually > lmhosts http://www.hsc.fr/ressources/breves/min_srv_res_win.en.html > Check the excellent work o

[Unattended] questions

as my questions where drop in the scripts turmoil, i repost them :) * is it possible to define a local-admin passwod with a prefix and some part of IP, some env var, or a randow stuff maybe ? what are the habits on this ? do you drop local Admin or have a common clear password in unattended.txt ? *

Re: [Unattended] questions + extra scripts

> > - > :: Install Eclipse v3 and examples > ::@Echo off > > SET zip="c:\Program Files\7-ZIP\7z.exe" > SET AUP=%ALLUSERSPROFILE%\Start Menu\Programs > SET prog=eclipse-SDK-3.0 > SET exam=eclipse-examples-3.0 > > :: Download from > > :: unzip Ecli

Re: [Unattended] questions + extra scripts

If my German is correct, give the admin users F permissions and give Users read access. I have enclosed another eclipse script. On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 08:28:01AM +0200, Martin Brodbeck wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 06:54 schrieb Julien TOUCHE: > > Hi, > > I want to install eclipse

Re: [Unattended] questions + extra scripts

Am Donnerstag, 12. August 2004 06:54 schrieb Julien TOUCHE: Hi, I want to install eclipse and found this in your email: > * eclipse3 (just copy) > xcopy /e /v /c /q /h /I "%SRC%" "%DST%" > echo y| cacls "%DST%" /E /G "BUILTIN\Administrateurs":F > "BUILTIN\Utilisateurs":R Can you explain these c

Re: [Unattended] Re: [Unattended] questions + patch

Hi Adam, hi Julien! > For PDFreator 0.8 > > PDFCreator-0_8_0_GNUGhostscript.exe /silent /norestart > or /verysilent if you don't want to see the progress bar. Thanks to both of you. I wrote a pdfcreator.bat based on your contribution and added it to the cvs. cu Niels

[Unattended] Re: [Unattended] questions + patch

At 05:27 PM 8/11/2004, you wrote: >* is there a way to impose classic theme to xp ??? it seems the following key doesn't work (even after new session or reboot) [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Plus!\Themes\Current] I can't remember where I found this, but if you put it in the unattend.txt

Re: [Unattended] questions + extra scripts

Steffen Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skriver: >> * to join to domain: which solution do you prefer to permit without >> putting main admin name/pass in unattend.txt ? >> (and this user must be admin, right ? a way to defined a user only for >> joining domain ?) Nope, dont need to be an admin but ne

Re: [Unattended] questions + extra scripts

On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Julien TOUCHE wrote: * after formatting, it asks for users to add to local Admin group: i didn't find a corresponding meta to auto answer on the advanced web page of the site. is there any ? I have this in unattend.txt ; Don't install any local admins (domain users) loc

[Unattended] questions + extra scripts

few questions/comments first (setup is a linux server with 4.4; use software.csv/hardware.csv; test with xpsp1): * even with software.csv, unattended ask me for os, but get the rest through csv * after formatting, it asks for users to add to local Admin group: i didn't find a corresponding meta to

[Unattended] questions + patch

few questions/comments first (setup is a linux server with 4.4; use software.csv/hardware.csv; test with xpsp1): * even with software.csv, unattended ask me for os, but get the rest through csv * after formatting, it asks for users to add to local Admin group: i didn't find a corresponding meta to

Re: [Unattended] Questions about "check" and "prepare" bash scripts

Tyler Hepworth wrote: Is it possible to pass the results of the "check" script to the "prepare" script so that only the missing items are downloaded instead of the entire ~1 GB? I ran check and have about 50 items missing, but I do not want to download each of them by hand. Doesn't the prepare scr

[Unattended] Questions about "check" and "prepare" bash scripts

Is it possible to pass the results of the "check" script to the "prepare" script so that only the missing items are downloaded instead of the entire ~1 GB? I ran check and have about 50 items missing, but I do not want to download each of them by hand. Thanks, Tyler Hepworth --

Re: [Unattended] Questions about making in 'net use' and installing OpenOffice

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2. I read about installing OpenOffice under windwos 2000. With > scriptings in the login it seems to work, but is there no easy way > to install OpenOffice for every user under windows 2000 ? Not to my knowledge. The best I have done is to create a shortcut on the "

Re: [Unattended] Questions about making in 'net use' and installing OpenOffice

Hi Bjoern, Wednesday, July 23, 2003, 4:34:17 AM, you wrote: bwhbd> 1. I need to make an net use of a public share so ' net use z: bwhbd> \\server\dir "" ' would be the right one the ' "" ' are needed bwhbd> because in that way I do not have to press enter when the bwhbd> question for the passwor

[Unattended] Questions about making in 'net use' and installing OpenOffice

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Hello! > > I just have two more questions and RTFM has happened! > > 1. I need to make an net use of a public share so ' net use z: \\server\dir "" ' > would be the right one the ' "" ' are needed because in that way I do not have to > press enter when the ques

Re: [Unattended] Questions about making in 'net use' andinstalling OpenOffice

hi .. > 1. I need to make an net use of a public share so ' net use z: > \\server\dir "" ' would be the right one the ' "" ' are needed because > in that way I do not have to press enter when the question for the > password is comming. > But as I would like this to happen in GUIrunOnce and this or

[Unattended] Questions about making in 'net use' and installing OpenOffice

Hello!   I just have two more questions and RTFM has happened!   1. I need to make an net use of a public share so ' net use z: \\server\dir "" ' would be the right one the ' "" ' are needed because in that way I do not have to press enter when the question for the password is comming. But as I

RE: [Unattended] Questions - Username for app installs

uot;); -- END CLIP -- Cheers, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick J. LoPresti Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 4:44 PM To: Norström, Daniel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Unattended] Questions "Norström, Daniel"