-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Robert,
On 18/12/15 20:05, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a few recent bug reports from Debian users that Unbound
> stops resolving after brief interruptions in network connectivity.
> Especially from users on laptops,
DNSSEC detects and blocks mangling, it does not bypass it. If your CPE or
your ISP are lying to you, and you need to access the sites they are lying
about, your only option is to use a different upstream resolver; you might
also have to use a tunnel.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finchhttp://dotat.at/
Hi Tony / list,
> DNSSEC detects and blocks mangling, it does not bypass it.
Thanks, I know.
What I am wondering is if the approach of recursive resolution, not explicitly
going through the CPE, suffices to avoid mangling. The CPE *could* still force
control over DNS traffic on account of tar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Havard,
On 30/12/15 00:28, Havard Eidnes via Unbound-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> a while back I needed/wanted to reconfigure my unbound recursor to
> have more memory available for the "rrset cache", in what seems to
> be a futile attempt at increasi
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 01:50:21PM +0100,
Rick van Rein via Unbound-users wrote
a message of 9 lines which said:
> What I am wondering is if the approach of recursive resolution, not
> explicitly going through the CPE, suffices to avoid mangling. The
> CPE *could* still force control over DNS
