Re: Multiple unbound instances

2016-03-04 Thread Miguel Miranda via Unbound-users
OK thanks. I have read the performance doc, So I have two servers that are serving 250k customers, it is recommended that I configure 10g for cache in one instance? I have 16 cores (with hyper threading) in each one. Should I configure 8 or 16 threads? El mar. 4, 2016 10:19 AM, "Andi via

Re: Multiple unbound instances

2016-03-04 Thread Andi via Unbound-users
Zitat von Miguel Miranda via Unbound-users : Hello to all, im installing a load balancer and i want to run multiple unbound instances, im doing this because my it experts says it is not recommended to have a huge cache (i have 32GB available) it is better to have 2

Re: Multiple unbound instances

2016-03-04 Thread A. Schulze via Unbound-users
Miguel Miranda via Unbound-users: Hello to all, im installing a load balancer and i want to run multiple unbound instances, im doing this because my it experts says it is not recommended to have a huge cache (i have 32GB available) it is better to have 2 or 3 GB cache in multiple unbound

Multiple unbound instances

2016-03-04 Thread Miguel Miranda via Unbound-users
Hello to all, im installing a load balancer and i want to run multiple unbound instances, im doing this because my it experts says it is not recommended to have a huge cache (i have 32GB available) it is better to have 2 or 3 GB cache in multiple unbound instances, this is good for high

Re: message is bogus, non secure rrset with Unbound as local caching resolver

2016-03-04 Thread Havard Eidnes via Unbound-users
>> Following the "not a bug" response from the BIND maintainers >> yesterday evening, can you please point to chapter and verse >> mandating this behaviour for non-authoritative recursive >> resolvers? > > RFC4035 3.2.3 for validators, all RRsets in answer and authority > sections should be