Re: Relation between ub_fd/ub_poll/ub_process and ub_ctx_async

2017-02-27 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users
Hi Rick, On 24/02/17 18:51, Rick van Rein via Unbound-users wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not quite clear on the relation between ub_ctx_async() on the one > hand, and ub_fd(), ub_poll() and ub_process() the other hand. The > latter triple can clearly be integrated with an event loop, but the > former

RE: Filtered Redirect (captive portal)

2017-02-27 Thread Simon Wedge via Unbound-users
Apologies for following this up but does anyone have any suggestions on what I should need to do to get a redirect everything working with some exceptions? It sounds like Unbound should be able to do this, but for the life of me I can't get it to work. Simon. From: Unbound-users [mailto:unbound

Not resolving some top level domain

2017-02-27 Thread battossai via Unbound-users
Hi, Unbound not resolving some domain, but it's works on bind. I have update the root.hint with this wget ftp://FTP.INTERNIC.NET/domain/named.cache -O /var/unbound/etc/root.hints Here is the example : *UNBOUND SERVER :* [root@ns1smg ~]# dig @localhost +trace polri.go.id ; <<>> DiG 9.8.2rc1-Re

Re: Not resolving some top level domain

2017-02-27 Thread Carsten Strotmann via Unbound-users
Hello Franky, On 27.02.2017 11:22, battossai via Unbound-users wrote: > Hi, > > > Unbound not resolving some domain, but it's works on bind. > I have update the root.hint with this wget > ftp://FTP.INTERNIC.NET/domain/named.cache -O /var/unbound/etc/root.hints > Here is the example : > > *UNBOU

Re: Not resolving some top level domain

2017-02-27 Thread battossai via Unbound-users
Hi Carsten, Thank you for your information. But the real issue is unbound unable to resolv an .id domain. Any other solutions ? Regards, Franky On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 5:39 PM, Carsten Strotmann wrote: > Hello Franky, > > local DNS server that allows cache snooping, which > Unbound does not

RE: Filtered Redirect (captive portal)

2017-02-27 Thread Simon Wedge via Unbound-users
I can now shed some more light on the behaviour: This is my test configuration: access-control-view: [ip-range]/24 whitelist ... local-zone: "." redirect local-data: ". A [server-ip]" ... view: name: "whitelist" local-zone: "google.co.uk" transparent view-first: yes ... Te

Re: Not resolving some top level domain

2017-02-27 Thread Carsten Strotmann via Unbound-users
Hello Franky, On 27.02.2017 12:04, battossai via Unbound-users wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Thank you for your information. > But the real issue is unbound unable to resolv an .id domain. > Any other solutions ? > does not seem to be a general Unbound issue, my Unbound resolves the .id domain witho

Re: Filtered Redirect (captive portal)

2017-02-27 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users
Hi Simon, These names: google.co.uk.sant.ox.ac.uk make me think that you have written CNAMEs and you did not terminate domain names with a trailing '.'. Domain names have to end in a trailing dot; and if you don't, the zone name is appended to name. In some cases unbound allows a missing tra

Re: Filtered Redirect (captive portal)

2017-02-27 Thread Over Dexia via Unbound-users
Could be I totally misunderstand the combination of aim and configuration, but from my understanding "redirect" doesn't redirect a client to use a different nameserver for his request. Instead, it answers all requests for a certain zone with a given ip. In your case, all queries for records of the

polri.go.id DNS issues (was: Not resolving some top level domain)

2017-02-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Unbound-users
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:54:11PM +0100, Carsten Strotmann wrote: > However the domain "polri.go.id" has several errors, see > > > and > It so happens that just yesterday I reported problems with IPv4 DNS t

Unbound does not response a forwarded query

2017-02-27 Thread Adrian Zhang via Unbound-users
Hi there, I am using unbound to forward mine.intra which is a private domain of Microsoft Windows Active Directory due to DNS server on Windows server has the record. first of all, there is a record file.mine.intra created on DNS server on Windows, and works for clients via running "dig file.

Re: Unbound-users Digest, Vol 111, Issue 20

2017-02-27 Thread battossai via Unbound-users
Hi Viktor, Sorry, not fully understand your explaination. It means NS polri.go.id is has error configuration for its DNSec ? Why bind still can resolv it ? What can i do to solve it with unbound ? Thank you. Regards, Franky On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:07 AM, wrote: > This looks like a miscon

Re:Unbound does not response a forwarded query

2017-02-27 Thread Adrian Zhang via Unbound-users
When I check Unbound cache, it shows unbound-control dump_cache|grep mine.intra file.mine.intra.86387 IN A 10.3.3.50 msg file.mine.intra. IN A 33152 1 47 1 1 0 0 file.mine.intra. IN A 0 3 records about file.mine.intra are generated by one client query. Adrian