On 07/27/2017 01:28 PM, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Jacob Hoffman-Andrews via Unbound-users wrote:
>> I'm trying to write some documentation for users of Let's Encrypt about
>> CAA. I believe it's the case that standards-conformant authoritative
>> resolvers should return NOERROR for qtypes they don't
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews via Unbound-users wrote:
> I'm trying to write some documentation for users of Let's Encrypt about
> CAA. I believe it's the case that standards-conformant authoritative
> resolvers should return NOERROR for qtypes they don't recognize, rather
> than NOTIMP. Is this correct? I
Hi all,
I'm trying to write some documentation for users of Let's Encrypt about
CAA. I believe it's the case that standards-conformant authoritative
resolvers should return NOERROR for qtypes they don't recognize, rather
than NOTIMP. Is this correct? If so, what is the relevant standard? I
haven't
Beeblebrox via Unbound-users:
Hi. I just came across this little snippet from
https://calomel.org/unbound_dns.html
forward-addr: 145.100.185.15@853 # dnsovertls.sinodun.com US
forward-addr: 185.49.141.37@853 # getdnsapi.net US
DNS via TLS (Port 853/tcp) is one way to encrypt stub-resolver
