Re: unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf

2015-11-09 Thread Tomas Hozza via Unbound-users
Hi Phil. Sorry for the late response. On 04.11.2015 17:35, Phil Mayers wrote: > On 04/11/2015 15:49, Tomas Hozza wrote: > >> If you have some strong technical argument for this behavior I would >> be more than glad to hear it. The reason is that similar people will >> fight hard against having

Re: unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf

2015-11-04 Thread Tomas Hozza via Unbound-users
On 04.11.2015 12:35, Phil Mayers via Unbound-users wrote: > On 04/11/2015 00:32, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote: > > Paul Wouters via Unbound-users wrote: > >> FYI: > >> > >> rhbz#1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in > >> /etc/sysctl.conf > >> > >>

Re: unbound and systemd

2015-10-21 Thread Tomas Hozza via Unbound-users
On 18.10.2015 16:34, Sami Kerola via Unbound-users wrote: > On 17 October 2015 at 01:55, Paul Wouters wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users wrote: > > > >> Your patch seems to want to customize the compile itself, and > >> always-active, install for

Re: Unbound not always resolving immediately after start.

2015-09-15 Thread Tomas Hozza via Unbound-users
On 14.09.2015 14:15, Daisuke HIGASHI via Unbound-users wrote: > Hi, > > SERVFAIL on tweakers.net seems to be from fix on CVE-2014-8500. > This fix essentially limits number of query (to authoritative servers) > to resolve target qname. If a qname requires many query to resolve > it becomes