Hi Phil.
Sorry for the late response.
On 04.11.2015 17:35, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 15:49, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>
>> If you have some strong technical argument for this behavior I would
>> be more than glad to hear it. The reason is that similar people will
>> fight hard against having
On 04.11.2015 12:35, Phil Mayers via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 00:32, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote:
> > Paul Wouters via Unbound-users wrote:
> >> FYI:
> >>
> >> rhbz#1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in
> >> /etc/sysctl.conf
> >>
> >>
On 18.10.2015 16:34, Sami Kerola via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 17 October 2015 at 01:55, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users wrote:
> >
> >> Your patch seems to want to customize the compile itself, and
> >> always-active, install for
On 14.09.2015 14:15, Daisuke HIGASHI via Unbound-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> SERVFAIL on tweakers.net seems to be from fix on CVE-2014-8500.
> This fix essentially limits number of query (to authoritative servers)
> to resolve target qname. If a qname requires many query to resolve
> it becomes