Re: [patch] insecure-lan-zones

2016-02-09 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Dag-Erling, On 07/02/16 00:29, Dag-Erling Smørgrav via Unbound-users wrote: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: >> When using unblock-lan-zones, you will more likely than not also >> need to disable validation for these zones. The

Re: [patch] insecure-lan-zones

2016-02-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav via Unbound-users
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > When using unblock-lan-zones, you will more likely than not also need to > disable validation for these zones. The attached patch adds a new > configuration option, insecure-lan-zones, which adds all AS112 zones to > the list of insecure domains. Note

[patch] insecure-lan-zones

2016-02-06 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav via Unbound-users
When using unblock-lan-zones, you will more likely than not also need to disable validation for these zones. The attached patch adds a new configuration option, insecure-lan-zones, which adds all AS112 zones to the list of insecure domains. Note that it moves the list of AS112 zones, which is

Re: [patch] insecure-lan-zones

2016-02-06 Thread Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users
Dag-Erling Smørgrav via Unbound-users wrote: > I hope I got the Makefile.in part right - it's pretty gross. Why don't > you use automake? +1 to Automake :-) Hacking on Unbound's Makefile.in is not fun. -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org