Ah, found it, sorry:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265564
Had missed the note that you had opened one already.
w
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:18:06PM +0200, "Mehmed Kahrić" via Unbound-users
wrote:
>
> Yes, unbound package is part of base/plus repo in RHEL 6 and 7 in version
> 1.4.20 and in EPEL el6 in version 1.5.1, but all with same typo...
Have you opened a RedHat ticket about it?
w
Hi Petr,
Yes, unbound package is part of base/plus repo in RHEL 6 and 7 in version
1.4.20 and in EPEL el6 in version 1.5.1, but all with same typo...
Regards, Mehmed
On Tue, September 29, 2015 10:45, Petr Spacek via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 23.9.2015 11:44, Mehmed Kahric via Unbound-users wrote
On 23.9.2015 11:44, Mehmed Kahric via Unbound-users wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> FYI, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, and derivatives (I checked CentOS,
> Oracle (Enterprise) Linux, and Scientific Linux), as well as EPEL for el5
> and el6 (epel7 does not have unbound package yet) have wrong (mistyped
Hi to all,
FYI, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and 7, and derivatives (I checked CentOS,
Oracle (Enterprise) Linux, and Scientific Linux), as well as EPEL for el5
and el6 (epel7 does not have unbound package yet) have wrong (mistyped)
private-address for a link-local range (192.254.0.0/16 instead of
1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Mehmed,
On 21/09/15 13:17, Mehmed Kahric via Unbound-users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a similar issue as reported in Bug 669.
>
> For some (one for now) CNAMEs we have a empty A record answer from
> Unbound. Proper answer came from remote DNS as
Hi,
I have a similar issue as reported in Bug 669.
For some (one for now) CNAMEs we have a empty A record answer from
Unbound. Proper answer came from remote DNS as showed in Unbound log and
tcpdump.
Identical issue came from both us Unbound instances:
- CentOS 6, Unbound 1.5.1 from EPEL, configu
