Re: Multiple stub-addr:|master: [Was: Re: Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?]

Hi Harry, On 01/06/18 19:22, Harry Schmalzbauer via Unbound-users wrote: > Am 09.01.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users: >> Hi Harry, >> >> Unbound selects forward addresses in the same way as it selects >> addresses for normal delegations. That is a random selection over the >>

Multiple stub-addr:|master: [Was: Re: Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?]

Am 09.01.2018 um 10:53 schrieb Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users: Hi Harry, Unbound selects forward addresses in the same way as it selects addresses for normal delegations. That is a random selection over the list of addresses with an RTT band of 400 msec. Hello, is this also true for master:

Re: Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?

Bezüglich Ralph Dolmans's Nachricht vom 10.01.2018 11:28 (localtime): > Hi Harry, > > On 10-01-18 06:31, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: >> Bezüglich Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users's Nachricht vom 09.01.2018 >> 10:53 (localtime): >>> Hi Harry, >>> >>> Unbound selects forward addresses in the same way

Re: Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?

Hi Harry, On 10-01-18 06:31, Harry Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bezüglich Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users's Nachricht vom 09.01.2018 > 10:53 (localtime): >> Hi Harry, >> >> Unbound selects forward addresses in the same way as it selects >> addresses for normal delegations. That is a random selection

Re: Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?

Bezüglich Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users's Nachricht vom 09.01.2018 10:53 (localtime): > Hi Harry, > > Unbound selects forward addresses in the same way as it selects > addresses for normal delegations. That is a random selection over the > list of addresses with an RTT band of 400 msec. Thank

Re: Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?

Hi Harry, Unbound selects forward addresses in the same way as it selects addresses for normal delegations. That is a random selection over the list of addresses with an RTT band of 400 msec. -- Ralph On 08-01-18 18:34, Harry Schmalzbauer via Unbound-users wrote: > Hello, > > I have defined a

Multiple forward-addr: _ order of evaluation?

Hello, I have defined a forward zone clause with two options "forward-addr:". Contrary to what I expected, the second definition _also_ receives queries (although the first is reachable and in perfect working state). I couldn't identify a pattern yet. And since I'm completely unfamilar with